Dear SR
I have noted your sentiments (and also those of another member Suneel Prasad who opines that policemen have discretionary power to let off offenders).
Those who expect / claim to represent the people must display the highest standards of probity in their personal life.
I bring to your notice some observations of the Supreme Court:-
"In a country governed by the rule of law, nobody is above the law, including judicial officers."
The Supreme Court was of the view that a judge's official and personal conduct must be in tune with the "highest standard of propriety and probity. If she has deliberately chosen to depart from these high and exacting standards, she is appropriately liable for disciplinary action"
Arvind is the one who called Parliament a den of thieves. AAP's top Mumbai man Mayank Gandhi is now, by his own public statement, exposed as no better than them.
Accordingly, I have given Arvind a public challenge to either begin the process of expelling Mayank Gandhi immediately, or take action through AAP's "Internal Lokpal" against him on my formal complaint, a copy of which was separately emailed to Arvind..
It is not a question of Re.1 or Rs.100 or Rs.100crores. It is the MORAL PRINCIPLE
If AAP's so-called eminent citizens LokPal can't even investigate a Rs.100 complaint against its own members how can a Jan Lokpal investigate a complaint of Rs.1,000 crores against powerful outsiders. As an engineer, I would say the Lokpal concept has flopped on the drawing board inside the lab.
PS: Incidentally the observations of the SC were in 2011 in a matter where a Mumbai lady magistrate was dismissed from the judicial service for traveling without a Rs.17 ticket in a Mumbai local train.
Insofar as AAP's working against corruption is concerned, I have clearly stated that not even 1 matter agitated by them has resulted in any conviction. In fact they are hired guns (aka NGO for hire) who intervene in PILs of other people and attempt to stall / derail them. COALGATE and CAG appointment being prime examples of their tactics.
Also, knowing AAP's dirty tricks dept, I'm sure they'll "procure" a back-dated receipt from the cops to show that Mayank Gandhi paid the challan.
Sarbajit
I have noted your sentiments (and also those of another member Suneel Prasad who opines that policemen have discretionary power to let off offenders).
Those who expect / claim to represent the people must display the highest standards of probity in their personal life.
I bring to your notice some observations of the Supreme Court:-
"In a country governed by the rule of law, nobody is above the law, including judicial officers."
The Supreme Court was of the view that a judge's official and personal conduct must be in tune with the "highest standard of propriety and probity. If she has deliberately chosen to depart from these high and exacting standards, she is appropriately liable for disciplinary action"
Arvind is the one who called Parliament a den of thieves. AAP's top Mumbai man Mayank Gandhi is now, by his own public statement, exposed as no better than them.
Accordingly, I have given Arvind a public challenge to either begin the process of expelling Mayank Gandhi immediately, or take action through AAP's "Internal Lokpal" against him on my formal complaint, a copy of which was separately emailed to Arvind..
It is not a question of Re.1 or Rs.100 or Rs.100crores. It is the MORAL PRINCIPLE
If AAP's so-called eminent citizens LokPal can't even investigate a Rs.100 complaint against its own members how can a Jan Lokpal investigate a complaint of Rs.1,000 crores against powerful outsiders. As an engineer, I would say the Lokpal concept has flopped on the drawing board inside the lab.
PS: Incidentally the observations of the SC were in 2011 in a matter where a Mumbai lady magistrate was dismissed from the judicial service for traveling without a Rs.17 ticket in a Mumbai local train.
Insofar as AAP's working against corruption is concerned, I have clearly stated that not even 1 matter agitated by them has resulted in any conviction. In fact they are hired guns (aka NGO for hire) who intervene in PILs of other people and attempt to stall / derail them. COALGATE and CAG appointment being prime examples of their tactics.
Also, knowing AAP's dirty tricks dept, I'm sure they'll "procure" a back-dated receipt from the cops to show that Mayank Gandhi paid the challan.
Sarbajit
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:21 AM, <ssr.singh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sir,
Good Morning.
As a convenor of IAC, we place you very high and are saddened when you join non issues.
I am not from AAP, yet find that they are doing something. Just writing mails and shooting letters are hardly of any significance.
Hope you will honour our expectations.
Anyone who is fighting corrupt system is far superior to those who are just bent upon criticising.
Regards and best wishes.
SR
Regards,
SR
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:05:27
To: indiaresists<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; Amitabh Lucknow<amitabhthakurlko@gmail.com>; urvashi sharma<rtimahilamanchup@gmail.com>; <parivartanindia@gmail.com>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Arvind Kejriwal, who are you fooling ?
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment