[HumJanenge] Re: NCPRI's suggestions on the RTI Amendment Bill

Dear Bhaskar

Suggestions:

1) I think all flavours of NCPRI probably agree that RTI needs to be
defended. And also that many other bodies like the political parties,
ie. PPPs, PSUs (owned by 2 or more public authorities if not by Govt.)
etc. must be brought under RTI.

2) It must be worked out how 2 incompatible stands eg. "RTI Act needs
no amendment" and "RTI Act needs to be urgently amended" can be
harmonised.

3) Do you have any clear stand on if the CIC order of 03.06.2013 is
sustainable or not. After all there is no point in defending the
indefensible.

4) Lastly we must not lose sight of the facts that this CIC order was
brought on us by certain professional RTIers who are heavily financed
by political forces as a distraction while the real political
haraamipan is being carried out elsewhere.

Sarbajit

On 9/27/13, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear friend,
>
> Thanks for your comments on NCPRI.
>
> Can you give any of your suggestions that you feel necessary to be said
> pertaining to RTi Amendment Bill.
>
> Thanks.
> Bhaskar

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.