When ever information is to be hidden for inaction, hidden agenda or vested interest, PIOs normally give funny reasons so that you have to move to first and second appeals, which will be heard after 4-5 years without any chance of penalty by IC. Matter ends by that time. PIOs forget that they are discharging quasi-judicial duty and not administrative one under RTI Act. This is good governance, transparency, accountability, containing corruption etc etc as far as RTI is concerned. We have experienced it in Gujarat for a decade. Let us not blame poor CPIO, DoPT since he has to serve in Delhi Central Govt. He must be under pressure for achhe din of common Indian!BJP is not walking the talk made during election campaigns and in manifestos. Only light at the end of tunnel is higher judiciary, if it works with bullet train speed as it did in case of Salmanbhai. Delay and dirt are our national diseases.
--- J. P. SHAH
Cell: 9924106490
It takes each of us to make difference for all of us.
On Sunday, 10 May 2015 7:59 AM, "'C K Jam' via RTI India : Right to Information, CIC" <rti_india@googlegroups.com> wrote:
--
Attached is an order of the Mr Rs Girdhar, CPIO, DoPT.- No subsection of Sewc 8(1) given while denying information- The reason given for denial is incorrect and has been struck down by severalHigh CourtsSomething more than meets the eye....in this whole appointment of CIC appointment.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RTI India : Right to Information, CIC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rti_india+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment