Thursday, May 27, 2010

Re: [rti_india] Fwd: [Indiarti] CIC to approach SC as ICs refuse to work

 

Dear Mr Raminder,

Unfortunately you are not a designated PIO under the RTI Act.
Otherwise, i would have dragged you to the CIC/SIC and hoped that they take you to task for providing misleading and incorrect information.

Please read: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/53519-supreme-court-agrees-office-cji-pa-defined-sec-2-h-right-information-act.html

Don't ask me why no newspaper or agency has covered this till now.
Maybe you can break the news.

Regards
RTIwanted



--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Fwd: [Indiarti] CIC to approach SC as ICs refuse to work
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010, 5:38 PM

 

Dear Shri Jam

On 7 Mar 2010 the registry of Supreme court challenged
order of bench of Delhi high court declaring office of the
CJI "public authority" under RTI. Notice was issued after that
to applicant S.C.Agarwall to reply. Case is still sub-judice.
Court outsiders are speculating that Registry did not ask for
stay so CJI has accepted the High court order. Actually
the legal position is that court cannot grant itself relief in its
own cause. So baba check your own facts.

R S Pabbi

.


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Get real-time World Cup coverage on the Yahoo! Toolbar. Download now to win a signed team jersey!

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment