Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
From: Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: <rti_india@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Fwd: [Indiarti] CIC to approach SC as ICs refuse to work
The link you give, points to your own post on the rti india dot org website. Nobody can download the attached decision, without registration. A click on the attached file would result with a pop up page saying "You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. ". Same applies to the link to the As for the "direct html link to the order on the CIC website.", why did you not post the link in this Yahoo! group at the first place, instead of opting for a "surrogate" way to publicize the rti india dot org website? Manoj --- On Fri, 5/28/10, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Fwd: [Indiarti] CIC to approach SC as ICs refuse to work To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, May 28, 2010, 9:24 PM
Manoj,
Why do double the work ?
In case you did not notice, the link I gave was to a post which not only had the order copy attached but also had a direct html link to the order on the CIC website.
Your choice...... .whether to register and download the order from that post OR just click on the html link and go directly to the order on the CIC website.
(No need to register to click on direct html links)
Choice is yours...Heads you win and Tails also you win.
RTIwanted
--- On Fri, 5/28/10, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo. com> wrote: RTI Wanted, why cant you make it a point to give information directly, instead of pointing the link to a third party site like rtiindia.org. This site, insists that you register on their website first, to download any information be it CIC or High Court / SC Judgement or even Govt. Orders on RTI. This kind of information should be on public domain and one should not insist on compulsary registration for downloading information of public interest. Best wishes Manoj
--- On Fri, 5/28/10, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo. com> wrote:
| . |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment