Re: [HumJanenge] RTI REPLY - HELP REQUESTED

as u have already filed the first appeal, please file complaint plus
first appeal with the CIC.

On 9/23/11, surinder pal <lsa_ludhiana@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Satnam ji,
>
> Do not make unnecessary correspondence with the Army now. You should have
> either filed the first appeal to the FAA after one month of application
> followed by IInd appeal with the Central Information Commission. You may
> file complaint also.
>
> SPA
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: satnam singh <colsatnam_61@yahoo.co.in>
> To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 5:50 PM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] RTI REPLY - HELP REQUESTED
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have been following the mails on RTI quite keenly.
>
> Can anyone guide me on following:-
>
> I had been seeking some information about an officer from the Indian Army
> since
> May 2011. I was informed in Jun 2011 that passing on of  the information has
> to
> concurred by the officer. I waited for more than a month, after the first
> reply, but
> did not hear from the Army Authorities.
>
> I  have sent five (5) reminders to the Army since then. The Army has not
> even
> bothered to reply to me after the first letter. Even my reminders have not
> been acknowledged. It seems the officer has not even bothered to reply to
> the Army.
> Can he keep mum and get away by hood winking the system? NO SECRET
> INFORMATION has been asked; it is only pertaining to the administrative
> matters.
>
> The officer is resisting to part with the information and I have a strong
> feeling that the system/organisation is unduly protecting him.
>
> Under the circumstances, what are my rights to get the details from the
> Army.
> Can I go to the court against the Indian Army?
>
> Warm Regards
> Satnam

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181