Re: [IAC#RG] New Electricity Connection

relevant portion from the SC judgment for your reference with link .........................

"Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, is very clear that it is
the duty of every licencee to give supply of electricity to the owner
or occupier of any premises within its area. [See Chandu Khamaru v.
Nayan Malik Others (2011) 12 SCC 314]. In this case, we find that
instead of ensuring that electricity is supplied to the occupant of
the premises in question in accordance with the provisions of Section
43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the respondent No. 1 is taking resort
to a defence to ensure that electricity is not supplied in accordance
with the provisions of the Act. The facts are very clear that there
was a meter installed and the supply of electricity was to a
registered consumer. If for some reason or the other, the meter is no
longer there and the registered consumer is no longer willing for the
supply of electricity, the occupier of the premises is entitled as of
her own right under Section 43 to supply of electricity and respondent
No. 1 should have ensured that such supply was restored to the
petitioner after complying with all necessary formalities as provided
under the Act and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder."

https://advocatemmmohan.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/section-43-of-the-electricity-act-2003-the-occupier-of-the-premises-is-entitled-for-electricity-supply-in-his-name-if-the-owner-refused-to-take-connection-in-his-name-section-43-of-the-electricit/

http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India, 
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,7838598740,8802797432,01132081075 ( call time -strictly 4 P.M to 8 P.M on all working days) Extremely sorry if not attended call outside this time limit 

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:22 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr. Harpal Singh Sethi 

Legally Ur not supposed to pay any bill amount which is not issued in your name Thus no need to give any undertaking as such. The Company is liable to give new connection to your flat if your able to prove ownership ..  

http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India, 
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,7838598740,8802797432,01132081075 ( call time -strictly 4 P.M to 8 P.M on all working days) Extremely sorry if not attended call outside this time limit 

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Harpal Singh Selhi <drharpal@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear All,

My wife was allotted a LIG flat from DDA as first time allottee of a new development. We applied for new electricity connection and after few weeks we got to know that our application had been rejected as part of our address is mentioned in another bill which is pending for payment i.e. the address mentioned is Mr Morya, XX-C, LIG Flats, Jasola.

Our flat address if XX-C, Second floor, Block-Y, Pocket Z, Jasola, New Delhi.

This Mr Morya had nothing to do with out flat, we are original allottees but BSES Rajdhani has now directed us to furnish an affidavit that we shall pay this amount in case it remains unpaid.

Please guide me how should we proceed. Can I seek information under RTI from BSES?  

Regards

Harpal

Dr Harpal Singh Selhi
Professor
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
DMC & Hospital, Ludhiana.

Resi:
527-L, Model Town,
Ludhiana-141002
Punjab (INDIA)
+91-9815022527

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in