Re: [IAC#RG] Swaraj Abhiyan exposed as Congress proxy

YES YOU ARE RIGHT!
Plus,
SWARAJ ABHIYAAN IS THE REAL AAP, THAT STANDS FOR SWARAJ !
The call on which we ALL rallied with AAP .
PURAN SWARAJ IS WHAT WILL UNITE BHARAT, end the colonial hangover ! Poison of politics and partyvaad that divides& poisons every heart.
Yes ! PURAN SWARAJ IS THE INCOMPLETE AGENDA OF OUR FREEDOM STRUGGLE AND WE MUST STAND United, AKHAAND, TO BECOME 'AKHAAND BHARAT' and attain PURAN SWARAJ!!!
Regards,Pawan.
Sent from my iPhone

> On 10-Feb-2016, at 7:37 pm, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When did I ask for support of any volunteers?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 08-Feb-2016, at 3:59 pm, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 8/2/16
>>
>> Dear Sh. S. Roy
>>
>> I agree that you have known these people-Aruna Roy, Arvind K and others more than most of us and therefore,your opinon should carry weight.
>> But now that Yogendra Yadav and P. Bhusan have invited her for support on 27-28, You cannot complain for the simple reason that Sh. Shantibhusanji had asked for your support of volunteers and you flatly refused.
>> Aruna Roy is now free from NAC and even in Rural employment schemes there is not much she can do. But certainly She has not been an anti-corruption crusader.Obviously her choice is wrong on the face of it .May be it is one time association.
>> Your assessment of Y.Yadav is correct.It would have been better if he had stuck to his earlier profession.
>> Prashant Bhusan has his commitments in PILs and the Courts. He cannot give more push to SA. Also he is not a public speaker like AK.
>> I understand that Anna Hazare has also been invited and he has agreed to participate. If that happens,it will be interesting to see what stands he takes against AK.
>> Ford Foundation or foreign financed outfits-will continue to flourish as they have been continuing for the last 65 years. Their roots and spread is very wide.
>> Finally if Swabhiman Abhiyan does not take off, some of the critics of AAP may rejoin AK or Congess(RG).
>> Reds
>> Jk>Gaur
>> ________________________________________
>> From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:59 PM
>> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
>> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Swaraj Abhiyan exposed as Congress proxy
>>
>> Dear Rakesh
>>
>> In my experience the persons are more important than the process.
>>
>> Our views on those persons are consistent and in public domain. If SA
>> chooses to associate with them, it is because discredited and rootless
>> persons like Yogendra Yadav are finding nobody else.
>>
>> It is absolutely inconceivable that professional parasites like Aruna
>> Roy et al are any kind of anti-corruption experts. The recent episode
>> where they got CIC Vijai Sharma to invite them (and only them) to the
>> CIC 10th RTI Convention so they could call for PM's speech to be
>> boycotted completely exposes them as Congress agents.
>>
>> It is very clear that fronts like so-called Swaraj Abhiyan are devices
>> to collective the disaffected for some Congress/AAP controlled
>> Maha-Gatbandhan in the future. I rather suspect that Yogendra Yadav
>> would go crawling back to AAP if invited and given some token post.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>> On 2/7/16, Rakesh Manchanda <rakeshmanchanda65@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It will be more sad for us if Corruption as *process* is not challenged
>>> collectively by all.
>>>
>>> Sh.Sarajeet roy your alert focus is more is on *persons and not on the
>>> process.*
>>>
>>> I agree your team should have invited during the finalisation of speakers
>>> in this new group-Anti Corruption Team-ACT.
>>>
>>> Yesterday few of us as independent birds attended the ACT preparation meet
>>> and it was cleared Swaraj Abhiyan is only one of several stakeholder
>>> groups.
>>>
>>> By the way this funda of Funds source alert controlling the agenda as
>>> highlighted by you is stale.
>>>
>>> This alert is unknowingly used again and again wherein the modern logic
>>> remains that 90% taxpayers who pay taxes need to get their funds and
>>> services back from the 10% corrupt lobbies.
>>>
>>> Allow me to share a recent article via link in this direction....
>>>
>>> Tolerance Vs Intolerance -Global Game controlled by 1%?
>>> http://beyondheadlines.in/2015/11/tolerance-vs-intolerance/
>>>
>>> Warm Regards,
>>>
>>> Rakesh Manchanda
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in