1) What the locus of Applicant to file this request is not clear ? Considering that he works for a competitor - 8(1)(d) is prima facie applicable.
2) Which procedures followed by CIC violate provisions of the RTI *Act* ???
3) Why does the CIC take notice of a decision of Jharkhand High Court ??
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogrou
>
>
> Another (in a long list) order favoring IIMA.
>
> IC SG "reserved" his orders after the first hearing.
>
> Then the matter was sent to a division bench of the CIC consisting of IC SG and CIC WH.
>
>
> The order is finally out and is attached to this post.
> It is still not available on the CIC website.
>
> The
> appellant has now sought a review on various grounds since the procedure
> followed by the CIC
> violates various provisions of the RTI Act itself.
>
> RTIwanted
>
No comments:
Post a Comment