[HumJanenge] Re: COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS : ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-013

Dear Mr Gupta

Someone who doesn't know that opportunity of hearing is mandatory for
appellants before the CIC can hardly be said to have a deep knowledge
of RTI Act. Suggesting that right of hearing can be dispensed with can
hardly be said to be a good amendment.

The truth is that Major Ravi has defected to the side of the RTI
haramis
(I have given you some proof) and hence people like him and Shailesh
who want to throttle the right of citizens to express themselves in a
statutory process can only be classified as "traitors".

You may please also read the entire thread below to determine the
origination of words like "prostitute" on this group and who used the
term..

Sarbajit

On Dec 24, 3:46 pm, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Major Ravi has a deep knowledge of RTI Act and implications of its different
> provisions. In the past, he has suggested some good amendments to the Act
> favouring the public.
>
> Use of ugly words like prostitutes etc. does not behove for this esteemed group
> and I appeal Mr Roy to exercise some restraint while writing any thing about
> other members. If v want that v should get respect from others, v should first
> learn to give respect to them.
>
> Without calling names, v shld constraint on the main issue without any
> deviation.
>
> ________________________________
> From: sroy1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com>
> To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005
> <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, 24 December, 2010 2:56:22 PM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS :
> ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-013
>
> Dear Major Ravi
>
> 1) Giving loaded revolvers to children is the height of
> irresponsibility. Similarly telling you where the RTI Act mandates
> presence of appellant in every appeal proceeding would be equally
> irresponsible on my part.
>
> 2) Just for this record, the declared purpose of this group (ie.
> Humjanege @ google). is "To expose and remove all obstacles to the RTI
> movement such as corrupt Information Commissioners and fake RTI NGOs
> like the NCPRI."
>
> 3) We shall leave it to history to decide who are the devils and who
> are the prostitutes. You have already declared which camp you are in.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Dec 24, 12:25 pm, Ravindran P M <pmravind...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mr Roy
>
> > I have heard enough of prostitutes talking of chastity and devils quoting
> > scriptures. Now I can also add sarabjit roy talking of rti!
>
> > But just for the records: please let me know where the hell in the RTI Act
> > is it mentioned that appellant must be present etc.as you have claimed.
>
> > May God save this country from thick headed people like you.
>
> > regards n bw
>
> > ravi