Re: [HumJanenge] Will Ms Aruna Roy / NAC reply to my simple query ?

Dear Sarbjit

This is the 22nd Dec 2010 NCPRI/NAC/IM4C meeting at IIC ?

You've really nailed the "Big Lie" of Aruna Roy, Wajahat, Dunu Roy
and all those other RTI "h***mis. Its very surprising that the mutual
aid society (love fest ?) of Aruna +++ Wajahat haven't denied your
evidence. More power to your elbow buddy

Raminder

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Ms Aruna Roy / Jayaram
>
> 1) FACT # 1, It seems from media reports that the NAC is opposed to
> the DOPT's proposed RTI Rules which prescribe 1 subject per RTI
> request and discourages lengthy RTI requests.
>
> 2) FACT #2, DoPT did not originally propose the 250 word limit or the
> 1 subject per RTI rule. These are someone else's proposals.
>
> 3) FACT #3, You / U-S( NAC) recently invited Mr Habibullah to be a
> participant of the expert group assisting the NAC / DoPT / GoI on
> these draft Rules.
>
> 4) FACT #4, It is Mr Habibullah, and Mr Habibullah alone who is the
> devilish brain behind these 2 proposals. The proof I submit is evident
> from paras 11 and 12 of this
> [http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/FAAD_08022011_01.pdf] which show the
> working of Mr Habibullah's mind since 2007 to undermine RTI Act on
> these issues..
>
> My QUERY:
>
> 1) Can you please share with us the specific inputs Mr Habibullah
> provided to the NAC on these 2 core issues recently.
>
> Sarbajit
>