Thursday, December 2, 2010

Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam

Dear Mr. Habibullah.!
 I have observed personally your temperament. Now the question has been raised bt the activists and the nation wants to know . This is not the proper way to escape. 
Plz join Bharat Swabhiman in the national interest and watch regularly Aastha Channel at 8-9 pm and Sanskar 9-10 pm

Dr. V. D. Sharma (Gandhian) "Krantiveer"
Asso. Prof. Dept of Business Economics(FMS)
V. B. S. Purvanchal University Jaunpur- 222 001 (UP) India
Mobile No. +91- 94158953889335010337,09919883533

--- On Tue, 30/11/10, wajahat habibullah <whabibullah@gmail.com> wrote:

From: wajahat habibullah <whabibullah@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 30 November, 2010, 7:37 AM

As explained, there were backlogs in upload, which I presume Tiwariji required to be made good. But you'll have to put the question to him
As for Sarbajit, as I've said before, he is an entertainer.
Wajahat

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Habibullah.

A few questions for you.

Are you implying that Mr Sarabjit Roy is a liar, and that orders from Jan 2006 till July 2006 are available on CIC's websites ?

Why is that when new CIC AN Tiwari took charge his first actions are to order that all CIC's orders are to be published on CIC website ?

Raminder


On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:21 AM, wajahat habibullah <whabibullah@gmail.com> wrote:
Certainly there are no orders to delete any decison from the website. In fact, every effort has been made as far as I know to display all decisions including those left out by oversight.
What absurd correspondence. You chaps have plenty of time on your hands. So have I, but I've retired.
Wajahat

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,7.0.html

Appeal No CIC/WB/C/2006/00066
Dated: 19/4/'06
Right to Information Act – Section 7(1)
Name of Applicant: Shri Shekhar Singh, Smt Aruna Roy & others
Name of Public Authority: Prime Minister's Office

Corrupt Chief Information Commission gives hearing within 48 hours to
email complaint of NCPRI big guns. Aruna Roy and Shekhar Singh had
filed a "life or liberty" RTI request to secure copy of a 3 ministers
report on SSP. They were already in possession of informal copies, but
Medha Patkar's advocate (another NCPRI big cheese) needed an "official
copy" to file in Supreme Court immediately.

On coming to know about this life or liberty request,  Prakash
Kardaley contacts me (being in Delhi) to immediately oppose disclosure
of this information to his NCPRI compatriots. I promptly email a "3rd
party" request to PMO, which is acknowledged and is transferred along
with NCPRI's request to Ministry of Water Resources. Along with NCPRI
I also receive a 3rd party notice for the CIC hearing. As per RTI Act
the CPIO cannot release information without intimating the 3rd party
and giving him opportunity to file appeals.

I and Veeresh Malik (another Hum Janenge moderator) reach the CIC
venue well in time. We find that neither Aruna Roy nor Shekhar Singh
are present, instead they have sent Arvind Kejriwal. The moment the
hearing commences, the CPIO of MoWR informs the CIC that as per
instructions of his Minister (Saifuddin Soz) he has just handed copies
of the controversial report (clearly marked as Confidential
/Top-Secret etc) to Ms Aruna Roy outside the hearing chamber so that
Prashant Bhushan can file the same in court the next day. I strongly
protest at this mockery of RTI Act / abuse of RTI process/ denial of
my 3rd party rights etc, but Habibullah and Ansari have been bought
off. The completely biased and corrupt order he delivers leaves no
doubt that he is a puppet.

The order has been deleted from the CIC website by Habibullah. Now
here is that order, attached so that the public of India can remember
what a corrupt person Mr Habibullah is, and how he used the CIC like a
condom for the NCPRI.




No comments:

Post a Comment