Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts

Dear Ms Singh

1) I don't consider myself to be an activist. My views on activists
(and especially RTI activists) are in the public domain.

2) I don't recall using the phrase "high-end". It resonates with say
"high end" whore or "High class" prostitute.

3) I have never corresponded with Mr Rejimon for a very long time now.

4) You have now started coming across my posts because somebody has
subscribed you to this group (after laying hands on the members list
of rti4..@yg ..)

5) I am not spewing "venom". I am releasing material (almost
exclusively govt records) into the public space which the
establishment wants suppressed.

6) For me personally, the important things is that the "system" should
be "fair". I am not asking for the system to be transparent. In fact
my experience is that transparency runs counter to fairness. We need
fair exams, fair courts, fair tribunals like the CIC/SICs.
Whenever, I come across examples of unfairness, I shall post to this
group (and other
groups) with supporting evidence and if you still want to stop me then
I must seriously
question your motives.

Sarbajit

On 12/2/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mr Roy,
> If you are considered a high-end RTI activist,then I will gladly bid
> goodbye to the RTI groups.BTW,before you pass judgement,I would suggest you
> ask the people who are on the Group (and VERY REAL people,believe me,L
> because I have met or spoken telephonically to many of them) as to whether I
> contribute positively or not.
> Hardcore doesn't imply licence to kill(with rude words) it implies a deep
> commitment ,and I think we will have to put to the vote whether your
> commitment is deeper than that of the the next man/woman.
> I have witnessed your personal attacks on this Group on people,with specific
> reference to Mr Rejimon.For a long period in the middle ,I did not come
> across your posts.You have,however,returned,and you are spewing venom most
> of the time,
> I request the moderators of the Groups on which Mr Roy is a member,to take
> me off those Groups if I also figure in those lists.All except
> rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com The rest of you,please carry on with your
> Group of high-enders!
> Best of luck.
> Urvi Sukul Singh
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "sroy1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:59 PM
> To: "HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005"
> <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts
>
>> Dear Ms Singh
>>
>> This is a group for hard=core RTI activists. Quite obviously ladies
>> with weak constitutions are not up to digesting alot of what is posted
>> to this group and most of which is quite frankly nausea inducing
>> concerning the rampant corruption in the Info Commissions and the
>> judiciary..
>>
>> I concur that a group like rti4empowerment@yahoogroups is the only
>> group which will suit your delicate temperament. The moderator there
>> is really scraping the bottom of the barrel if he permits posts from
>> you and RSingh631 etc to his members (somebody else has already shown
>> that half the member list over there is fake).
>>
>> PS: If you read the first post in this thread, you will find that it
>> was not I who raised this issue/attack but the Law Commission of
>> India.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> Urvi Sukul Singh wrote:
>>> Mr Roy,
>>> You suggest action against people making suggestions yet your language
>>> and
>>> the tenor of you mails is absolutely unbearable at times.Time someone
>>> took
>>> action against you.Most of what one has read over the last few weeks is a
>>> load of rubbish,with you a regular participant.
>>> I have requested being taken off all groups other than
>>> rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.Kindly comply.Otherwise,till I get the
>>> mails,if
>>> I feel the need I will reply.
>>> Urvi Sukul Singh
>>> PS I find this attack on the judiciary very unseemly.
>>
>