Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Re: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam

I wonder this platform discussing dirty issues than discussing the RTI.  Day in and day out, some members have starting using borderline language and defamatory language raising all type of attributins and made this blog to abuse any body without sharing responsibility or suggesting ways to improve.  Just finding fault with Shri Wajahat Habibullah, Shir Shailesh Gandhi and others will not help the matterrs and we will loose large chunk of members. 
 
I pray that YESU to give good sense to all of us. We r ignoring good work done by the former CCIC and being done by Shri Shaijesh Gandhi and v r just seeing the dark side of the issue.  We all shld know that how Mr. Wajahat has forced the DoPT to remove the statement from its website tht notings r not covered under rti act?  Let us introspect that if v r appointed IC, will v b able 2 do better in t face of govt resistane.  (However, no body is going to appoint us).  Gone r the days when v can chant "koi nrap ho hame kaa haani".  Now, we are dependent on d govt for every thing from womb to tomb. I m not advocating that the ICs or Judges should consider this aspect but only stating reality of lile.
 
An Hon'ble member has written that when all the decisions were available on the CIC's website, why a decision was taken to upload all the decision?  Rightly, all the decisions were not uploaded at that time but even after the decision in the meeting, the decisions taken in Oct. or probabliy earler also by Shri A N Tiwari as checked in the last week of Oct. 10 were not uploaded on the website though the decision was taken at his behest,  This has followed after I sent an Email to Shri A N Tiwari and also to the rti4empow..yg and on Dwarka Forum blogs. Every thing is on record but fail to understand why some members ignore the shortcomings of others and target only the present CCIC and one IC.  

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Kuldip Gyaneswar <kuldipgyaneswar@gmail.com> wrote:
where has the discussion gone? thngs have been blown out of proportion..


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
members plz stop this nonsense


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Dr. Jagnarain Sharma <dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All
       It is some thing unusual, a challange to the male society by
the so called Lesbians.
       It is a challange to the social values, a society in which
husband & wife and children live. It is also a challenge to
motherhood,  by Lesbians.
       There would be no more child birth in Lesbian women.
       It is  a challenge to human values, philosophy of  karma
theory of give & take, share love affection.
      As   seema misra wrote:
      Proud to be called a FEMINIST LESBIAN LAWYER.
       She said   Good bye to all those.  She also have no intention
of interacting anymore with obscene men.
        Seema Misra   also dislike many more men.
Is it not hatred to the men hood ?
         May be that  Seema had a bad experience with male society.
         As she is a Hindu(if not converted to other religion), on
every birth, one has to carry   Prarabdh Karma.
         She can can not  circumvent the karma theory of give & take.
         May be that she do not want children.
         But may be when she along with her  lesbian friend get
older, she may need some one to help her in their old age.
         In Indian Society  every  family want male child to run the family.
         But many families have only female child, but they accept
the truth and remain happy till end of  their life and  if they get a
good son in law, they still feel happy.
          I do not know, how other members of this group accept what
Seema Mishra has said. I do not want that  overnight seema may change
her decision, but I want to share only my views and experience, which
I gained by meeting more and more lesbians during my stay in western
countries.
          God may bless Seema Mishra
          Dr JN Sharma




On 11/30/10, Ashok Kumar <imaka@in.com> wrote:
> In today's world where emancipated women are rubbing shoulders with
> "obscene" men, demands for special courtesies/considerations are genuinely
> out of place. The obscene men should be taken headon.  Original message
> From:"sroy 1947"< sroy1947@gmail.com >Date: 30 Nov 10 17:21:42Subject: Re:
> [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada DamTo:
> humjanenge@googlegroups.comLady Macbeth: "OUT damn spot, OUT I say !!Another
> brilliant legal analysis1) That the NCPRI are the biggest F****rs of the RTI
> movement2) That they dumped their load (hereinafter called "wad") intoCIC's
> official email ID.3) That CIC dumped the aforesaid wads (after suitable hand
> manipulations)upon other agencies of Govt.4) That the manipulated wads were
> conveyed in envelopes5) That another name for envelope is condom6) That
> hence I have reason to suspect CIC to be a condom vending machinefor the
> NCPRI.QEDOn Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:34 PM, seema misrawrote:> Proud to be
> called a FEMINIST LESBIAN LAWYER.>
>   Good bye . have no intention of interacting anymore with obscene men.>
> Seema Misra>Dear humjanenge! Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID
> now!
>



No comments:

Post a Comment