[HumJanenge] Re: IC MLS not interested in RTI anymore ?

Dear Karira

Mr Umapathi is not any retired senior citizen, but is actually younger
than either of us.

I wanted to prove some point concerning 3rd party rights, and which is
reflected in the order.

1) The 5 days to intimate the 3rd party begin from the time the CPIO
decides to disclose the information. Unfortunately even seasoned
RTIers like Mr Umapathy who are members of this group think that 5
days starts from date application is received by PIO. They also
foolishly believe that the 10 days for 3rd party to object runs
simultaneously with the 30 days available to the PIO. By this
decision, I have shown that where there is a 3rd party involved the
RTI request can be delayed by at least 1 year. I am sure that all the
PIOs and FAAs will take very serious note of this decision and it
shall become yet another precedent where I have STRENGTHED the RTI ACT
to bring out its true spirit and intent.

2) Insofar as the information is concerned, as a true RTIer I shall
upload it to this group and put Mr Umapathy (and Mr Shekhar Singh) out
of their suspense

Sarbajit

On Sep 20, 8:53 am, C K Jam <rtiwan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mr Sarbajit,
>
> "3rd Pary" interventions to safeguard your privacy and personal rights ?
> And that too from a retired senior citizen from Bangalore ?
>
> http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/FAAD_08082011_01.pdf
>
> More to it than meets the eye !
> What are you hiding in those 7 emails Mr Moderator ?
>
> RTIwanted
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] IC MLS not interested in RTI anymore ?
>
> What is more interesting is that the HT does not name the RTI'er who dug out this information. Obviously RTI-Taxi SC Agrawal has been pipped to this information by somebody ever since I have begun filing "3rd party" interventions to safeguard my privacy and other personal rights..
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:59 AM, C K Jam <rtiwan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From this news report, it appears that IC MLS has lost interest in RTI:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.hindustantimes.com/Top-bureaucrats-were-in-race-for-the-CV...
>
> >RTIwanted