Thursday, January 27, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] RTI activist shot in UP

Issue-baed debate/discourse may pl not be allowed to be degenerated to personal barbs/comments etc.
Some common parameters of dialogue are accepted on all web fora,to the best of my knowledge.Such requests have been made by me and others time and again,and fortunayely,have also been accepted on all fora.Hopefully this sense of maturity will dawn on this forum ,too.All in line with the avowed objectives of the forum,and in tune with the letter and spirit of the cause of advancement of larger public interest.
Pl consider these humble words as pearls of wisdom for fullest possible acceptance and follow-up action

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Chanchal <> wrote:
Dear Friends,

This is my first mail to this group, though i keep reading most of the mails. Sometimes i felt to quit, but  left the idea, not because it ever sensitized me about any of the issue discussed here, but atleast it keeps making me aware, that though many of us claim to work for RTI, just a few of us (literally can be counted) really do so. Maximum of us want to comment to make ourself in the centre of the Debate.

Now, a man who filed an RTI application was shot dead, the issue of RTI remains NREGA, a flagship scheme over our govt get boast of.

Now, what proof we require to be submitted by the Victim's side to get case highlighted by RTI Supporters like us. Are we here to help for RTI activists? 

Mr Sharabjit, your few ideas really motivates me but i feel sorry that most of them reflect your immaturity. Well I don't know at what position you work at and what capacity you have to suuport RTI; but atleast I can say this that you are the not one who can really fight for common man right. You guys believe in just making comments over one another................ It seems that RTI has become such a Issue, where people are just making a race to come at fore front seeing others in their competition; to be called that they are the ones who work for RTI.
Now, yourself says that he filed an RTI against  BDO for NREGA Issues. Is not enough for us just get sensitized even we know what RTI is; leave to be called as RTI activist, shame on us ............... if we can't do anything ourselves, atleast we can motivate others to do.

with warm regards 

On 27 January 2011 23:04, M.K. Gupta <> wrote:
I fail to understand the comments of Mr Roy.  No real RTI activist will comment like that in a hurry without knowing the facts.  Facts have been mentioned by Mr. Roy himself that "All we have so far is that he used RTI against a BDO in NREGA related matters." When this geneleman has filed an RTI application and was shot at, first of all the niddle of suspicion will naturally go on his act of submitting the RTI application.
We should not work here to discourage and doubt whitle-blowers.  Greatness is linked to the deed and not to the preaches and being suspectical when the facts indicate to some issues.  For more facts, please see my views under heading "DEATH, THE AWARD OF HONESTY FOR HONEST CITIZENS AND WHISTLE BLOWERS". 

--- On Thu, 27/1/11, nripinder kalia <> wrote:

From: nripinder kalia <>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI activist shot in UP
Date: Thursday, 27 January, 2011, 10:40 PM

My dear Sarabjit,
Please do't qoute like that.whom so ever he may be,but he filed an
application under RTI Act so he may be considered as an activisist.Let
us be bit polute.


On 1/27/11, Sarbajit Roy <> wrote:
> What evidence is there that this gentleman is an RTI activist ?
> All we have so far is that he used RTI against a BDO in NREGA
> related matters.
> Sarbajit
> On 1/27/11, Agniwesh Thakur <> wrote:
>> Dr Amarnath Pandey from Sonebhadra UP is shot for exposing the corruption
>> by
>> BDO.
>> When this anarchy is going to be end. How many more voices will be
>> silenced..
>> Urging all people to stand united against the atrocities towards Whistle
>> Blowers. Let's not fall prey to bullets.
>> Regards
>> Agni
>> Hyderabad
>> Excuse Typos.Sent my BlackBerry®


No comments:

Post a Comment