Dear Dr. Elangbam
I thank you for your spirited email asking for UCC which I had forwarded to my seniors. Please see the bolded words below in context.3) That we do not support the RSS (Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh) who no doubt posture as defenders of Hinduism, but had sold out their movement to USA sometime in the late 1930s after Dr. Hedgewar's ill heath. The RSS does not at all represent Hindus today but only a tiny section of Hindus called "banias" who are corrupting the nation in name of Hindutva for their personal profit/ gain.
4) That my movement has studied foreign / alien religions for many centuries and know well their devilish ways and tricks to render Hindus impotent.
5) My movement especially views the UCC as a fiendish foreign device (trick) to convert India into a nation of sheep and make us into impotent "peaceniks" ever content to stay confined within some arbitrary drawn territorial borders no Hindu patriot would accept. Islam and Hinduism both had clearly understood why polygamy is an option to be retained in any martial society.
6) That silent majority of Hindus are as equally against UCC being imposed on them as Muslims are.
Sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:11 PM, kameswar elangbam <dreksingh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,We must support UCC and give reasons in absolute terms.This country will go to dogs, ungovernable in future and the very existence will be at stake.May we may antagonize a sizable section of the population, never mind, even amongst them there are a great silent majority, who wish to express their mind and raise their voice but just because of the same fear of the fundamentalist, they are forced to be quite.Let us rise above politics and all other issues for the sake of the nation; we should submit an unanimous view of approval to establish UCC.Dr K S ElangbamOn Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Amitava Sanyal <saamit1@hotmail.com> wrote:5. Not optional
6. Regulated
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Dharmesh Dutta <duttadharmesh@gmail.com>
Date: 10-13-2016 12:11 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC
5. No
6. Regulated
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.netSarbajitSubscribers may post their viewsb) Polyandrya) Polygamy6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?b) Noa) YesTo get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible hereSarbajit
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf
"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment