Thursday, October 20, 2016


Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj,

I confirm that we don't know each other or have met each other, but I do hope you recall the email with ID <> you sent me on 8 Oct 2016 at 12:34 PM (Delivered after 1 seconds) containing, inter-alia, the following text regarding your piece titled "My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'".

"Thanks. Do forward it to whoever you think might be interested.

And let people know that the name-changed person in the article is the current chair of DCW, as you might have guessed."

and thereafter

".. because quid pro quo relationship continues to pan out at the expense of public trust, norms that flow from public office and law, as well as public funds.

All AK's appointments are 'apna aadmi' appointments rather than 'aam aadmi' ones and the appointees are getting fat salaries and fringe benefits.

And the appointees themselves -- like the lady in question -- are making further 'apna aadmi' appointments.
This lady is now under ACB investigation for making more than 80 such appointments.

That's not all. The lady is acting as the hatchet woman on AK's behalf.."

and thereafter

"PS. By the way the pic attached has yours truly with the name-changed person. November 2008. Travelling from Coimbatore to Palakkad."

Since equally I have never met either Ms. Barkha Singh or Ms. Swati Maliwal or Ms."Shilpa", but I am deeply concerned about the allegations of nepotism you conveyed to me about "apna aadmi" appointments, I have every right as a citizen of India and voter of Delhi to directly enquire from the Chief Minister of Delhi as follows:-

a) Who the "present DCW chair" is ?

b) If there is/was any quid-pro-quo involved in Govt of Delhi's nomination of Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind as DCW chair, ie if at all Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind is indeed the present DCW chair ?.

c) On what basis Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind was nominated as DCW chair out of all the women in Delhi ?

Equally, It is open to the Chief Minister not to reply to me.

And finally Kapil, let me question you under the common law of India, existing since British times, since you have publicly alleged that your employer (then a married Govt servant) in 2008 indulged in liasons and bedroom farces (also known as "illicit connections" in family law) in State government guest house rooms with another employee (female), you must first explain how your purported employer came to employ both of you in the first place considering that he was a public servant at the time.

PS: If you read carefully, my usage of the term "sexual affair" was attributed to NEWSGRAM.COM's linked article and its headline "Who is Shilpa: Her Sexual affair with Arvind Kejriwal : Former journalist Colleague Kapil Bajaj raises question".


Sarbajit Roy

> Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Kapil Bajaj <> wrote:
To whoever is the recepient of Sarbajit Roy's mail.

Neither have I taken any names of women that Sarbajit Roy has used in
his email nor have I used words like "sexual affair" and "allegations"
in any email exchange with him.

I don't think I know Sarbajit Roy personally or have ever met him in my life.

kapil bajaj

On 20/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <> wrote:
> To:
> Chief Minister GNCTD
> Kind attn: Shri Rajeev Gupta, OSD to CM
> Dear Rajeev
> *ji*
> I had received an email from Shri Kapil Bajaj, a journalist who is well
> known to Shri Arvind Kejriwal*,* regarding the liasons" / "bedroom farce"
> Shri Arvind Kejriwal allegedly had in 2008 with "*the present chair of
> DCW*",
> and which Shri Bajaj claims to have personally witnessed, and which, as per
> Mr. Bajaj, culminated in "*apna aadmi*" appointment of the said person as
> .Chairperson of Delhi Womens Commission.
> Mr. Bajaj's allegations are also in the media, eg. NEWGRAM.COM run by a
> former Aam Aadmi Party volunteer Dr. Munish Raizada
> Since Shri Bajaj has not named the individual in this alleged "*sexual
> affair*" with Mr. Kejriwal, but has only written to me (through his email)
> that it is the *present chair of DCW*, I am in a quandary considering that
> the statutory RTI disclosure of Delhi Govt mentions that Smt. Barkha Singh
> is Chairperson of DCW, the copy of which was emailed by me to CM Delhi's
> email ID earlier but no reply was received.
> In the meantime, a lady one Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind is claiming in public
> to be the Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission and has leveled serious
> allegations by innuendo seemingly against Dr. Harsh Vardhan, Union Minister
> of Science and Technology, who is *inter-alia *the BJP's Member of
> Parliament for the constituency where GB Road brothels are situated.
> In these circumstances, I would be highly obliged if Delhi Govt locates and
> provides me by *close of work today* the gazette notifications or orders
> related to the appointment of present Chairperson and members of the Delhi
> Women's Commission. In the absence of such notification from GNCTD I shall
> presume that Smt. Barkha Singh is the present DCW chair and I shall be
> contacting her directly concerning Mr. Bajaj's allegations.
> Alternatively, Hon'ble Chief Minister may kindly direct whoever is the
> Chairperson of Delhi Women's Commission to publicly name the *"Union
> Minister and important Delhi-based leader of a national party*" who is
> allegedly the patron of the GB Road prostitution brothels as was alleged at
> a widely reported press conference held by Ms. Swati Maliwal Jaihind on or
> about 22.Sept.2016, again widely reported.
> I have reason to believe and am aggrieved that these allegations by
> innuendo directed seemingly at Dr. Harsh Vardhan are at the instance
> (so-called "credible lead") of one Shri Ashutosh Gupta, National
> spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party, who lost to Shri Harsh Vardhan in the last
> Lok Sabha elections.and who bears a grudge against Dr. Harsh Vardhan. Mr.
> Ashutosh is the same lunatic person who publicly alleged that my deceased
> relative was in a sexual affair with Mr. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and I
> say that Mr. Ashtosh Gupta has no credibility whatsoever.
> sincerely
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Sarbajit Roy <> wrote:
>> Dear Mr. Kapil Bajaj
>> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>> 1) The only other recipient of my email is Arvind Kejriwal <cmdelhi@...>,
>> I would therefore be obliged if my communication is not circulated.
>> 2) I conveyed the "imputations" as I understood it. beginning with " ..
>> *recounts
>> an incident in Kejriwal's liaison with a young woman who now chairs a
>> statutory body of his government.*".
>> 3) Since Arvind, and apparently everybody who has worked for him,
>> habitually believes in writing fiction and passing off fiction as fact
>> <see
>> annexure-1), I am highly aggrieved that Ashutosh chose to make scandalous
>> imputations concerning my relative and he was not immediately dismissed
>> from Arvind's party. It is no defence that Ashutosh, being a professional
>> journalist like you, slightly altered the name of the fermale through
>> years
>> of professional experience.
>> 4) As per you, the "relationship" was "informal" and involved an episode
>> you witnessed "Behind closed door" and described *inter-alia* in the
>> following language "*It was an extraordinary sight. .. The Ramon
>> Magsaysay award winning 'social activist,' whom I had witnessed being
>> feted
>> in Kochi the other day for promoting transparency, was engaged in some
>> kind
>> of secret bedroom farce with his own young colleague. *"
>> 5) Arvind Kejriwal is a public figure who voluntarily joined politics and
>> fought elections. If the result of those elections permits him to appoint
>> meritless people only because they are "related" to him, then I (as a
>> citizen of India and elector of Delhi) have every right to question him
>> directly, and I shall do so. Arvind is equally free to choose not to
>> reply
>> and I look forward to seeing which officer his efficient OSD will forward
>> my email/s to this time.
>> sincerely,
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> Mob : +91-8010205897
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Kapil Bajaj <> wrote:
>>> Whoever is the recipient of Sarbajit Roy's mail,
>>> 1. My article, 'My Stint with Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and
>>> 'Social Activism,' does not use the phrases "sexual relationship,"
>>> "at night," or name "Swati Maliwal," nor did I use these phrases and
>>> the name in any interaction with Sarbjit Roy.
>>> 2. I never told Sarbjit Roy that I am "saddened by the way politics
>>> seems to have affected you".
>>> 3. I never "asked" Sarbjit Roy to contact "you" directly concerning my
>>> "piece".
>>> kapil
>>> On 09/10/2016, Sarbajit Roy <> wrote:
>>> > *To*:
>>> > Shri Arvind Kejriwal
>>> > Chief Minister of Delhi
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dear Arvind
>>> >
>>> > I am receiving reports from various places that one of your close
>>> > associates in PCRF has very recently imputed in public domain that you
>>> are
>>> > / were in a sexual relationship with Swati Maliwal. Incidentally Swati
>>> > Maliwal is now the Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women after
>>> you
>>> > recommended her for the post and you publicly denied she was related
>>> > to
>>> > you.
>>> >
>>> > Accordingly, I have contacted the author of the piece (*My Stint with
>>> > Kejriwal: Wising up to 'Democracy' and 'Social Activism'*), and he
>>> > reiterates his allegations that in November 2008 he observed you in a
>>> close
>>> > position and sharing a bed with Ms. Maliwal behind locked doors in a
>>> guest
>>> > house at night, despite that.all of you had separate rooms. The author
>>> has
>>> > also written in the same piece that he observed you giving Ms. Maliwal
>>> > large denomination notes (currency) when she requested it.
>>> >
>>> > I am sure that you would be aware of what I am alluding to, however, I
>>> can
>>> > supply a copy of the piece if you need it.
>>> >
>>> > I would hope/expect that you swiftly rebut / nip these claims made by
>>> your
>>> > associate. To me at least, and you know that I am highly sceptical of
>>> > people who make such allegations with thin or no evidence, there
>>> appears to
>>> > be some prima-facie veracity in the detailed circumstances and motives
>>> > narrated by this 'public spirited' author who, like me, is saddened by
>>> the
>>> > way politics seems to have affected you.
>>> >
>>> > *NB*: I am highly offended that Ashutosh contines as National
>>> Spokesperson
>>> > for your party after he publicly insulted my ancestor Ms. Sarlaa
>>> > (Debi)
>>> > Chaudhurani by baselessly alleging she was in a sexual relationship
>>> > with
>>> > Gandhi. I am again requesting you to throw him out.
>>> >
>>> > I look forward to some action with 48-72 hours, ie. till Dusshera.
>>> >
>>> > *PS*: I am bcc'ing a copy of this email to the author of the piece,
>>> since
>>> > he has asked me to contact you directly concerning his piece.
>>> >
>>> > sincerely / warmly,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Sarbajit Roy
>>> > B-59 Defence Colony
>>> > New Delhi 110024
>>> > Mob: +91-8010205897
>>> >
>>> --


No comments:

Post a Comment