recommendation that the Committee makes to the President.
Unfortunately, all these RTI activists are arguing from the wrong side
of the table and making fools of themselves.
The procedure for "selection" is that the PM, a Union Minister
(selected by the PM) and the leader of the Opposition recommend a name
(or names) for appointment from persons eminent in the various fields
specified. If the query was better rephrased as "procedure for
appointment" (instead of selection) it would be seen that there IS a
"procedure" and there are "criteria".
If this procedure is to be challenged / assailed, it should be in a
fit case and on a proper cause of action by somebody competent to do
so.
Sarbajit
On 12/31/10, jayanta sanyal <jayantasanyal@rediffmail.com> wrote:
> so the Committee will have a record of its proceedings or not?
>
> On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:11:52 +0530 wrote
>>12(3) says, "Chief Information Commissioner and Information
> Commissionersshall be appointed by the President on the recommendation
> of a Committee consisting of -"
>>
> In such circumstances, what other name to the Committee can be given?
> However, DoPT has not objected on this score and has provided the
> information, though partially.
>
> This issue is not about the Committee or Selection Comm.... but about
> the procedure of selection and the adoption of the criterion for the
> same.
No comments:
Post a Comment