i think justice dept is with ministry of law and justice and not home ministry
On 4/23/12, prasad vaidya <
prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Sarabjit
> I and schoked by reading news on Mr. Singhavi and appointment of judges in
> Supreme Court
> Following persons who were although eligible for appointment were not
> appointed even as Chief Justice of High Court
> these peoples were senior in rank
> 1)Justice Mohit Shah presently Chief Justice Bombay High Court appointed as
> Judge of High Court in 1995
> 2) Justice D.K. Deshmukh appointed as Judge Bombay High Court in 1996
> 3)Justice D.D. Sinha appointed as Judge Bombay High Court in 1996
> 4) Justice Marllapalle appointed as Judge Bombay high Court in 1997
> 5)Justice J.N. Patel presently Chief Justice Calcutte High Court appointed
> as judge of Bombay high court in 1996
> where as
> 1) Justice Vikramjeet Sen appointed as Judge Delhi High Court in 2000
> appointed as Chief Justice Karnataka High
> 2) Justice S.S. Nijjar appointed as judge of Delhi High Court in 1999 now
> judge of supreme court
> In the view of the the above information it appears that the appointments
> are arbitrary and there is no transperancy in the appointment of Chief
> Justice
> of High Court and judges of Supreme court
> recently Chief Justice of Jammu and kasmir appointed as judge of supreme
> court who was first appointed as judge of Madras High Court in 2000.
> The justice dpartment is under Home ministry and Mr. p Chidambaram is the
> Minister that is main reason his name is not implicated
> in 2 G scam and SC Judges are passing any remarks against him
>
> viadya
>
> --- On Mon, 23/4/12, Sarbajit Roy <
mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Sarbajit Roy <
mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com>
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Kind Attn: Smt. Mrs. Smita Vats Sharma (Addl.
> Registrar)
> To: "humjanenge" <
humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Monday, 23 April, 2012, 10:14 AM
>
>
> Copy of an RTI I have filed to Supreme Court today.
>
> To:
> Mrs. Smita Vats Sharma
> Additional Registrar/
> Central Public Information Officer
> Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.
> Tel. No.23073580/ Fax No.23384533
> e-mail:
supremecourt@nic.in>
> Date 23-April-2012
>
> BY EMAIL:
>
> Sub: Application / Request for Information u/s 6 of The Right to
> Information Act 2005
>
> Respected Madam,
>
> I am caused to address this RTI request for information to you in the
> larger public interest concerning certain scandalous statements and
> obscene videos being circulated in the online media concerning
> appointment of Judges to the Superior Courts with approval of the Most
> Hon'ble Chief Justice of India.
>
> At the outset, let me state that I am not accompanying the RTI
> application fee of Rs.10 since it has been previously clarified to me
> by you (and confirmed in Appeal by the Ld. Registrar Mr. Sunil Thomas)
> that the said fee has not been "prescribed" by a notification in the
> gazette. If the situation has changed in the meantime after I pointed
> this out, I am always ready and willing to deposit the same so that my
> application is not deficient in any way.
>
> The Information requested by me is as follows:-
>
> 1) All "information" (as defined in RTI Act) which is (a) maintained,
> or (b) accessible to, or (c) held by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of
> India or his Office concerning the consideration of one Advocate Ms.
> Anusuya Salwan, or suchlike, for appointment and/or elevation as a
> Judge of the Delhi High Court. NB: If the same has been weeded out, a
> copy instead of the weeding out order(s)may be provided to me.
>
> 2) A true copy of the videographic information, if any, which caused
> the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India to return the proposal for
> appointment of Ms. Anusuya Salwan as a Judge of the Delhi High Court
> and/or the Supreme Court..
>
> 3) A copy of the letter from Ms. Meenakshi Arora , Sr. Advocate,
> withdrawing her consent for consideration for appointment as a Judge.
>
> It is pertinent to mention that I am filing this RTI request very
> reluctantly and with the utmost regard and respect for this Hon'ble
> Court where I am a litigant appearing in person.. My cause of action
> is an obscene video allegedly featuring 2 prominent advocates
> indulging in unnatural sexual acts in consideration for this judgeship
> which is being circulated over the internet over a notorious
> international pirate website which has defied all efforts to shut it
> down. The details of the obscene video are given below.immediately
> under my own particulars, and considering its contents I suggest it be
> opened, if at all, by a person of the male gender as it is sure to
> offend the tender sensibilities of the female gender..
>
> Yours sincerely
>
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel : 011-2433-4262
>
> Video details.
>
>
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/7198956/Abhishek_Manu_Singhvi_CD_Real_Copy>
> INFO HASH EA286A5CE25DBEB570B7B0EE244125420B46F279
>
> Description:
> "Real Scandal Image of Abhishek Manu Singhvi (Congressmen ) India.
> Chair person of Standing committee in Indian Parliament asked to have
> sex with him and for her service he will help her to get promotion.
> that lady later on appointed as Judge in Supreme court."
>
--
Sankar Prasad Pani
A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
India
PIN-751007
Cell- 9437279278
http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/http://www.merinews.com/cj/sankarprasad
No comments:
Post a Comment