Dear Group,
1) The formula works very well, and I get about 75% acceptance of such RTIs.
All the "good quality" PIOs /PAs invariably accept such RTIs.
2) As Manoj has pointed out, the drafting is critical
3) It is not limited to section 4 information, the formula applies to all section 6
requests.
4) There is no need to use digital signatures
5) The "slight flaw" is not a flaw but a procedural interpretation. I am sure
that when some RTI activist tries to replicate our formula and gets an
unfavorable order from the Commissions, that this route will be blocked
for all of us. ;-)
Sarbajit
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com > wrote:
I tried it out some time back and I should be "shocked & shaken, but not stirred" to tell you that I got all information. This includes from seven PA in your city of Mumbai. I also tried it out, with two Central Govt. PA in J&K, long before their own (news avatar) came into force.
It all depends on how you draft the email elaborating the provisions of Section 6 & 7, like Sarbajit described, without quoting Section 4. Of course, I had sent digitally signed emails.
Though the points give by Sarbajit are all sound, there is a slight flaw. Let us leave it to the "not so disclosure friendly" CPIOs & FAAs "disclose" this flaw to us. Till then enjoy the slice of bread.
Regretfully still petrified.
Manoj Pai
--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com > wrote:
From: Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com >
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: The greatest RTI discovery since the invention of sliced breadDate: Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 11:34 AMDear Sarbajit,Appreciate your invention. It will also be good if somebody has tried such means of application and/or you try one test case by appling so by electronic means, with out fees.Bhaskar PrabhuMahiti Adhikar ManchMumbai> >
> > Say Sarbajit.... isn't it shocking. I am petrified.
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > Manoj
> >![]()
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment