Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Is corruption "good" and to be encouraged

 

      Dear Sir,

      Cancer is growth of damaged or bad cells. Cancerous means 'unrestrained' growrth. How can we accept or manage 'small amount' of cancer? Is it not an example of वदतो व्याधात ?

      With regards to all,

      ----------Mukund Apte

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Vijay

A very pertinent question which I am responding to.

The human body is filled with "unclean", "bad", "poisonous" (ie.
"corrupt") substances.
The human being thrives / flourishes / grows BECAUSE of these
substances which are NECESSARY BY-PRODUCTS of growth.

A "cancer" is "unrestrained" growth. If detected in time, it can  be
surgically removed.

So Yes, a small amount of cancer can be tolerated / managed if growth
continues.

Sarbajit

On Apr 19, 8:00 am, Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kap...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would like to pose a counter question: Is a certain amount of cancer good?
> Regards,Victor
>
> --- On Wed, 4/18/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Is corruption "good" and to be encouraged
> To: "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 5:24 PM
>
> What folows is based on a story publ;ished in "The Week" magazine last month
> In a nutshell.
> 1) Gen. V.K.Singh has left the Indian Army in a shambles and unable to fight even a 2 day war with China.
>
> 2) He has done this for his personal goals (at the instigation of his family members)3) He has draped himself in the cloak of a corruption fighter and thereby ensured that no important file for procurement of vital supplies desperately needed by the Army was processed. In fact even files already approved were reopened.
> 4) The net result is that the majority of SERVING officers are bitterly opposed to CoAS V.K.Singh whereas the veterans (IESM) seems to back him.
> In this background (and considering that enough information has emerged from both sides), can we discuss the larger question
>
> A) Is a certain amounty of corruption acceptable to ensure that "things get done" (ie. speed money). ??
> Sarbajit

--
      With regards to all,
      ------Mukund Apte