I fully respect and defer to anybody who is on the side of truth and
integrity.
I have know nothing which would cause me to say that you are not on
that side.
I have not said anything about you personally, and if I have implied
it, I apologise freely.
I look forward to reading your WP, IF it is admitted.
Considering your choice of counsel, however, nd her associations and
the other "baggage" they bring to the table, I am inclined to doubt
that anything other than more shrill media publicity will result.
Like McArthur, there is nothing more embarrassing than an old soldier
who refuses to go away !!!.
Sarbajit
On Apr 5, 8:41 am, Devasahayam MG <m...@airtelmail.in> wrote:
> Dear Mr Roy,
>
> Don't be too presumptuous and pretend to be Mr. Know All. I will share with
> you the WP once it is admitted. Read it, understand its contents if you can
> and then comment. And at least with people like us use restrained language.
>
> M.G.Devasahayam
> _________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Rahul
>
> > Has anybody, as yet, publicly disagreed or disproved what Shekhar Gupta
> > wrote ?.
>
> > 1) Did the army movements in question take place or not ? Who ordered them
> > ?
> > 2) Were the movements curtailed / countermanded ? Who countermanded them ?
> > 3) Why does Mr Devashayam HIDE from us that he is one of the
> > petitioners in the SC now asking for V.K.Singh to "carry on" as Army
> > Chief ? Will he share with us the Petition that he has filed ?
> > 4) Lastly, it is evident that Mr Devashayam knows hardly anything
> > about how matters are handled in SC. I OTH have been appearing there
> > (albeit intermittently) for albeit 30 years now, and I can sense that
> > V.K.Singh had to "withdraw" his petition because he was on legally
> > weak ground. IMHO as an old soldier he "ran away to fight another
> > day".
>
> > We are all committed to the LARGER CAUSE, its the "running dogs" we
> > have to be careful of.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On 4/5/12, Rahul Kumar <rahulk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Press and the journalists should own for what they write.
>
> > > They should be brought under the laws for publishing insensitive and
> > thrash
> > > information without confirmation and like any other citizen of India
> > charged
> > > for inciting the public by giving wrong information.
>
> > > If Rushdie's book is banned and Advani is charged for outrages speech at
> > Ram
> > > Mandir what is there to give immunity to this particular privileged
> > citizen
> > > of India?
>
> > > rgds
> > > rahul
>
> > >>________________________________
> > >> From: Mahesh Khera <mkkh...@yahoo.com>
> > >>To: Humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> > >>Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2012 6:37 AM
> > >>Subject: [HumJanenge] Uncovering of Truth - IE Story of Suggesting an
> > >> Attempted Army Coup Needs Investigation
>
> > >>Dear Mr Sarbajit and friends,
>
> > >>Shekhar Gupta has taken out a story in IE which suggests that there might
> > >> have been an intention of an Army coup in the country led by the Army
> > >> Chief. While, every one very rightly has trashed the story on all
> > national
> > >> TV channels, there is a need to conduct an impartial investigation into
> > >> this most diabolical news item unprecedented in the history of free
> > >> India. The largest democracy of the world can not sit idle and do a
> > cover
> > >> up just through a couple of debates on national TV channels. Keeping
> > quiet
> > >> about it would be the greatest dis-service to the nation.
>
> > >>If the story has any substance then under the relevant laws, the guilty
> > >> should be promptly punished in an exemplary way. If however, the story
> > is
> > >> just a concocted one then an exemplary action should be taken against
> > the
> > >> IE and Shekhar Gupta for sedition under the prevailing laws.
>
> > >>Free press must be respected but that does not mean that one can get away
> > >> after suggesting some thing which is so explosive that threatens the
> > >> safety, security, defense, integrity, honor and the very existence of
> > the
> > >> country.
>
> > >>I suggest Mr Sarbajit to seek the views of the members of HJ group and if
> > >> majority wants an independent probe then as a group, we should approach
> > >> the honorable PM to order an impartial inquiry forthwith.
>
> > >>With warm regards,
>
> > >>Col Mahesh Khera
No comments:
Post a Comment