Friday, September 2, 2016

[IAC#RG] Request for clarification about certain libels by your party spokesperson made in connection with ex-Minister Sandeep Kumar

Dear Chief Minister

Sub: Request for urgent clarification about certain libels made by your party spokesperson in connection with ex-Minister Sandeep Kumar's dimissal

I must inform you that the entire high command of Hindustan Republican Army (HRA) is extremely upset with the insensitive, illiterate and uncouth comments of your AAP spokesman Ashutosh made in a NDTV blog post titled as "The Sex Was Consensual, Private Act. Why AAP Punished Its Man" published: September 01, 2016 20:27 IST and accessible at

In a melange of bizarre assertations defending the indefensible sexual escapades of your AAP minister, your party spokesman has alleged as follows:

"Indian history is full of examples of our leaders and heroes who had lived with their desires beyond social boundaries. Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru's reported affairs with many female colleagues were juicy gossip but it didn't spoil his political career. His relationship with Edwina Mountbatten is widely discussed. The entire world knew about it. Their affections continued till Pt. Nehru's last breath. Was it a sin? History is also witness to the fact that top leaders of the Congress in 1910s were worried about Gandhiji's relationship with Sarla Chaudhary, who was distantly related to Rabindra Nath Tagore. Gandhi Ji had confessed that Sarla was his spiritual wife. Kasturba Gandhi was very disturbed. C Rajagopalchari and other senior leaders of the party had to intervene. They persuaded, pressured, cajoled Gandhi-ji to leave Sarla. Gandhiji in his later days slept naked with his two nieces to experiment with celibacy. Pandit Nehru had told him not to do so as the country would rise against him but Gandhi-ji did not budge."

Can you please clarify for the benefit of HRA movement your party spokeperson's very recent writings besmirching HRA's icon Sarala Devi Chaudhurani

a)  What if any, as per AAP spoekesperson, was the exact "relationship" Gandhi (HRA will not dignify this turd on India's history by affixing a suffix "ji" to his surname) had with this "Sarla Chaudhary" ?

b) How exactly was Sarala Devi Chaudhurani "distantly related" to Rabindranath Tagore ? Was she not his niece ?

c) Which history records as a "fact" that there was anything remotely sexual in this alleged relationship ? Do you seriously count the alleged historian grandson (who incidentally is also a member of your party) of the homosexual traitor Gandhi as a credible source for this canard ? Can you show that Gandhi was in India in 1910 ?

d) What is the purpose of the AAP's gutter innunedo by coupling of references to Gandhi sleeping naked with his nieces made just after the unsullied name of Sarala Devi Chaudurani ? Are you, and your fellow RSS dropouts for whom Mohan Gandoo is the new symbol, so under-educated and unaware that in 1910 (Ashutosh's date not mine) the "top Congress leadership" was actually disturbed with Gandhi's German homosexual Jewish lover Kaltenbach who had gifted a 1,000 acre farm in South Africa to Gandhi so the two top-n-bottom "soulmates" (Gandhi's words not mine) could live together forever ? In 1910 Kasturba Gandhi was actually disturbed about the homo-erotic Gandoo dalliances with Kaltenbach, which is something which the mostly homosexual top brass of RSS (and AAP ??) wish to cover up concerning their darling icon.

e) Therefore, Hindustan Republican Army seeks from these 2 AAP defamers, ie Shri Ashutosh Gupta, and Shri Rajmohan Gandhi the complete explanation why some AAP persons have defamed and sullied the pure name of a chaste Brahmin lady from Punjab of one of the leading Mohyal (Brahmin) and Arya Samaji families of Punjab by repeating certain canards concocted by some members of your party.

PS: Since the videos circulating of your ex-Minister show that whereas the sexual congress bwetween the players was conceivably as real as that between the AAP and Congress in those 49 days, the women involved definitely then did not give consent to either (a) the secret recording of these objectionable adulterous acts by your party MLA, or (b) the publishing of these videos by your Minister.

I reiterate that if you are actually as honest as you publicly proclaim yourself to be, you will get Sandeep Kumar prosecuted for his criminal offences under Information Technology Act as expeditously as you dismissed him.


Sarbajit Roy

No comments:

Post a Comment