Monday, September 26, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] IAC and our nation's defence preparedness

लो दिखाओ अब तुम्हारा 56 इंच का सीना है या कुछ और है।पाकिस्तान के बाद अब चीन तो भारत में 45 km अन्दर घुस कर कैंप भी बना लिया है। मदारी भी अच्छा बोल लेता मगर वो सिर्फ लोगों का मनोरंजन कर सकता है, उसके सिर्फ इस गुण के कारण उसे देश का प्रधानमंत्री नहीं बनाया जा सकता।

At a time when Pakistan was carrying out Uri attack, the Chinese Army intruded in Anjaw of Arunachal Pradesh. They had entered Indian territory on September 9 and had set up camp at an area some 45 km inside the territory.

At Kapapu the Chinese Army has built up Maul track, log and wooden bridge etc and drive out the Indian Army up to Najong 23 kms point near Chaglagam.

On Sep 27, 2016 10:22 AM, "Sarbajit Roy" <> wrote:
Dear IAC subscribers

Some comments have been made on our list that IAC is not doing anything.

Let me assure you that IAC is silently working and reporting corruption by public servants concerning our national security and borders. For eg. on 24.08.2016 the MHA (Border Management Division) has issued an advisory letter on a complaint made by IAC. IAC name is a terror in certain Ministries.

Correspondingly, our members are mature enough to realise that disclosure of our complaints to the movement would allow the 'haramis' to frustrate us. However, recognising that the larger movement must be involved, we shall invite submissions / inputs from our seasoned members from time to time.

In the recent URI incident, it is crystal clear that Pakistan was well aware of the resentment of the forces with the 7th pay commission and its panoply of associated matters which Modi Sarkar (like all sarkars before it) has ignored like ostriches with their heads up their posterior, and Pakis have exploited it.

Accordingly, IAC solicits inputs from our list on the following

1) NFU (Non-functional pay upgrade) controversy

2) Corps of Engineers versus IDSE controversy in MES and corrupt role of a particular IAS Additional Secretary/MoD of Bihar cadre in privatising the MES (ie. removing CoE at the top) so that a regime of corruption prevails there like it does in NBCC and NPCC in civil side so that militants can infiltrate the weak spots deliberately created by corrupt civilian engineers.

On NFU and associated anomalies, let me state in advance to our IESMs that IAC does not expect that the Anomalies panel shall give a clear ruling, and more time will be wasted for all of you.

Email me directly <> in confidence, or to the list publicly.


Post: ""
Exit: ""
Quit: ""

No comments:

Post a Comment