Monday, August 9, 2010

Re: [rti_india] CIC: Information Commissioner blasts RTI awards

 

Dear Sh.Raminder, First of all , I will give you links of two most corrupt decisions of IC(Ansari) ---without calling appellents without getting allotted ministery (1) Railway ministery have never been allotted to him.Despite this, it is not clear what was the extreme urgency to IC(Ansari) for rejecting this appeal having much wider public interest without conducting hearing without inviting rejoinder from appellent without having any jurisdiction on rly ministery. CIC/OK/A/2009/000055 againt M/o Railways asking for surcharge and development charge on goods and account head inwhich this has been used. As per decision, there is no public interest in it.Well done Prof Ansari. (2)CIC/AT/C/2008/00106 against INCID(water resources ministery)---This public authority have returned application,first appeal sent by speedpost.IC (AT) have taken strict action and asked for immediate comments. But how this matter allotted to IC(A) , nobody knows. In the decision , liability of sending RTI application have been cast on appellent RATHER THAN SENDING INFORMATION ON PA and imposing penality for extreme negligence of refusing to receive RTI application,first appeal.Very shamefully, this appeal decided without conducting hearing without sending reply of CPIO for enabling appellent to file rejoinder for hearing/decision without hearing. So IC(A) jurisdiction is infinite and can entertain any appeal without getting allotted ministery.He should introspect his own work rather than commenting very brilliant iitian Sh.Kejriwal. Manoj K.Kamra

--- On Tue, 8/10/10, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com>
Subject: [rti_india] CIC: Information Commissioner blasts RTI awards
To: "rti_india" <rti_india@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 8:14 AM

BBC has obtained a copy of email (bottom) from India's Central
Information Commission
sent to the PCRF stating that this dubious body it is an association
of blackmailers, and
its awards are a fraud, and that the Central Information Commission
will not associate itself
with these blackmailers.

Raminder

From: M M Ansari <mm.ansari@nic.in>
To: pcrf@pcrf.in
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010
Subject: A Reply to Shri Arvind Kejriwal's letter of june 16,2010

Dear Shri Kejriwal,

            Kindly refer to your letter No.PCRF/09-10/981 dated June
16, 2010, asking me to nominate PIOs and information seekers from the
categories of citizens and journalists for conferring RTI awards.

I understand that National Awards are given to
individuals/institutions for their outstanding contributions and
services in different fields of social work.  Such awards are
conferred by the highest national authorities or credible professional
bodies, which are recognized as leaders in different spheres of
national development.

I am not aware of the role and achievements of PCRF in any area of
social activity, including RTI related activities.  I think this body
and all those functionaries, who are functioning under the aegis of
PCRF, which is operating from a residential colony in U.P., is
committing a fraud in the name of conferring awards.

I also fail to understand as to how you have got associated with such
a dubious body like PCRF, which has no locus standi in the galaxy of
institutions established in our country by the Governments and
philanthropic organizations.

It also occurs to me that a few individuals have come together under
the umbrella of an entity like PCRF to adopt and indulge in gimmick
practices for blackmail of authorities.  They do so by adopting
unscientific exercises to mislead the masses and media.  I am saying
so because I am aware of the contents of a Report prepared by PCRF, a
copy of which was also sent to me a few months back.  This Report is
full of malicious contents against the Information Commissions, which
are credited with effective and successful implementation of various
provisions of the RTI Act.  A vital task of assessment and evaluation
of performance of Information Commissions was handled
unprofessionally.  And it has shamed us, particularly at the time when
the entire Indian citizenry and world community have widely
appreciated the enactment of right to know and the manner in which the
rights have been guaranteed to the citizens.

In view of impious intentions of the functionaries of PCRF and lack of
its credibility, I may not be of any help and assistance to you in
this regard.

I am so sorry,

Yours sincerely,

Prof. M.M. Ansari
Information Commissioner

Shri. Arvind Kejriwal
Public Cause Research Foundation
A-119 Kaushambi,
Ghaziabad – 201010 .(U.P.)


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    rti_india-digest@yahoogroups.com
    rti_india-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    rti_india-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment