some correction IN CAPITAL LETTERS AND DARK AND UNDER LINE.
From: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Cc: kapoorsatish@yahoo.com
Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 11:10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
Dear Mr Kapoor,
Ur first point is totally correct. I filed Rectification of order BY AN APPEAL . But at that time the same Judge WHO TOOK UP THE MATTER AND PASSED THE ORDER took up the matter after 15 YEARS !!!!. Apologise for the same. Does not have power to rectify the same. But said only to go to Hon.Supreme Court of India. I pointed out the fact having written in my application Before Criminal court. I also wrote in my appeal application that He showed his hand to sit down by showing his hand!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????.Without going through the application just wirte down the words sadi by Advocate only. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
God save us.
God save us.
Regards,
C A Shah D J
USA
USA
From: Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsatish@yahoo.com>
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 10:12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
Yes, in India it is possible that Judges ignore your pleadings to favour other party OR even go to extent of writing pleadings, you never spoke.
S.K.Kapoor
From: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 8:23:09 PM
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
I have other experience. Judge immediately goes to giving Judgments without referring whole case!????
C A Shah D J
USA
C A Shah D J
USA
From: kamal <peoplefortransparency@yahoo.com>
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 7:11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
Good going sir
From: LESLIE ALMEIDA <lesals2000@yahoo.com>
Sent: 27 August 2010 18:23
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
u/s 32 of the Advocates act one need not be represented by a lawyer, one can argue his/her case
many citizens are fighting their own cases however they make study on the subject matter, search enging like google and bing are very useful, I fought a case on my own against two opposite lawyers and won
this gave me a boost to my morale.
lawyers have no time to make case studies/judgements, they pratice in court and then in the evening attend to clients? good money, no time to learn things.as of date there are very few trusted lawyers
the fees are absorbedent and sometimes if the opposite party have money power they are brought over due to greed and they will sell u for a song. written without prejudice as they are some good lawyers who cannot be brought.as of date i am fighting another appeal case on my own strength.
i had a bitter experience regarding property matter to send a legal notice he said Rs 1000
plus expenses postage charges etc, i just needed a "will" from a party who was not parting with same after receiving it he demands Rs 5000 as fees utter blackmail, i did not pay him .told him to keep it under his pillow and sleep over it. got it through through other source.
Mr Leslie Almeida
Mumbai
,
,
[The entire original message is not included]
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment