[rti_india] Is there a Lazy Bum at the CIC ?

 

Somebody had posted about how a certain IC was the
most efficient and hardworking. This is unfortunately
not borne out by facts.

On 30-Aug-2010 the no. of cases listed before ICs is
as below

CIC(WB) = 2
IC(AT) = 9
IC(SM) = 14
IC(AD) = 16
IC(SG) = 12
IC(MLS) = 11

On 31-Aug-2010 the nos are:-
CIC(WB) = 2
IC(AT) = 6
IC(SM) = 17
IC(AD) = 12
IC(SG) = 12
IC(MLS) = 7

In terms of pendency (approx), some inconsistencies due to
recent reallocations.

CIC(WB) = JUNE 2009
IC(AT) = MAY 2010
IC(SM) = DEC 2009
IC(AD) = MARCH 2010 (AVERAGED)
IC(SG) = JULY 2010
IC(MLS) = FEB 2010 (AVERAGED)

Will the lazy bum please follow IC(SM)'s example

Sarbajit

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___