Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case

Friday, August 27, 2010

Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case

Dear all,

Times of India dated 27-08=2010 in its first page carried a news item captioned " 5 Judges in AP caught copying in their LLM exams" Not to speak of the large numbers who escaped, who paid examiners to close their eyes and so on ! Now this being the ramifications do we need any further explanations to the quality of judgments, how they are weighed and so on!
All those who initiate their actions assertively and aggressively had, at the back of our mind that "yes in the event of repercussions we have an honourable Justice system to turn to" has instilled a state of hopelessness! Now where do we go from here!

Corruption and greed has encompassed each and every strata of our administration, except God ?

Iyer GA
Iyer

--- On Sat, 28/8/10, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 28 August, 2010, 4:37 AM

Dear All,

I had faced one my own case. In this case I was just going to defend my self by counter arguing the say of Advocate. I was kept remian silent by showing Judge's hand to sit down. What ever the words spoke by Advocate, can not be written in this group, was written in Judgement!!!
All the words derogative to me personally. But totally wrong !!!!!
This is position of our JUdiciary.

C A Shah D J

From: virender johar <virender.johar@gmail.com>
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 9:17:29 AM
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case

Dear Leslie,

My heartiest congratulations. I have been fighting various cases not only for my self but others and success certainly gives u encouragement. regretablly Judges in India especially in Quasi Judicial matters by Registrar Co-operative Societies one is not sure how they behave.and whether they will sell themselves before Advocates???

Regards,

Col V K Johar

On 27 August 2010 18:23, LESLIE ALMEIDA <lesals2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

u/s 32 of the Advocates act one need not be represented by a lawyer, one can argue his/her case

many citizens are fighting their own cases however they make study on the subject matter, search enging like google and bing are very useful, I fought a case on my own against two opposite lawyers and won

this gave me a boost to my morale.

lawyers have no time to make case studies/judgements, they pratice in court and then in the evening attend to clients? good money, no time to learn things.as of date there are very few trusted lawyers

the fees are absorbedent and sometimes if the opposite party have money power they are brought over due to greed and they will sell u for a song. written without prejudice as they are some good lawyers who cannot be brought.as of date i am fighting another appeal case on my own strength.

i had a bitter experience regarding property matter to send a legal notice he said Rs 1000

plus expenses postage charges etc, i just needed a "will" from a party who was not parting with same after receiving it he demands Rs 5000 as fees utter blackmail, i did not pay him .told him to keep it under his pillow and sleep over it. got it through through other source.

Mr Leslie Almeida

Mumbai
,