Why is the bum so lazy when it comes to RTI??
Here is the answer:-
http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/2010/Aug/28/panday-is-acting-chairman-26.asp
Not satisfied (it seems) with being appointed to a cushy World Bank post, Mr. Habibullah (to quote this news report) is lobbying hard to be appointed Chairman of one of India's most cash rich private banks, (incidentally closely connected to the Congress Party and purportedly used for their money laundering operations).
"Meanwhile, some `potential' candidates have started hectic lobbying to grab coveted post.
Sources said India's Chief Information Commissioner, Wajahat Habibullah and Kashmiri banker, Irfan Muzammil Soz, head of the Middle East Operations of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC) are lobbying hard for the post of chairman, J&K Bank. Irfan is the son of state Congress chief Prof Saif-ud-Din Soz."
--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "sarbajitr" <sroy1947@...> wrote:
>
> Somebody had posted about how a certain IC was the
> most efficient and hardworking. This is unfortunately
> not borne out by facts.
>
> On 30-Aug-2010 the no. of cases listed before ICs is
> as below
>
> CIC(WB) = 2
> IC(AT) = 9
> IC(SM) = 14
> IC(AD) = 16
> IC(SG) = 12
> IC(MLS) = 11
>
> On 31-Aug-2010 the nos are:-
> CIC(WB) = 2
> IC(AT) = 6
> IC(SM) = 17
> IC(AD) = 12
> IC(SG) = 12
> IC(MLS) = 7
>
> In terms of pendency (approx), some inconsistencies due to
> recent reallocations.
>
> CIC(WB) = JUNE 2009
> IC(AT) = MAY 2010
> IC(SM) = DEC 2009
> IC(AD) = MARCH 2010 (AVERAGED)
> IC(SG) = JULY 2010
> IC(MLS) = FEB 2010 (AVERAGED)
>
> Will the lazy bum please follow IC(SM)'s example
>
> Sarbajit
>
No comments:
Post a Comment