Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam

Proud to be called a FEMINIST LESBIAN LAWYER. 

Good bye . have no intention of interacting anymore with obscene men. 

Seema Misra

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:47 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Rummy

Wrong pudding !
As of now I'm checking this one out

Just imagine, there I was yesterday complaining about a High Court
judge who was shafting RTI, and here I find his better half cavorting
with "Seema Misra"s in Shopian "manufacturing stories" (when they
could have been downloading them instead from that "talk" website).

BTW: I tend to agree with you, the cadence of the writer's post isn't
feminine. (Or she could be  one of those feminist / lesbian.types the
legal profession has a surplus of ??).

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Raminder Singh
<ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarbjit
> This is one pudding I'd like to eat
> http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2045333_postmistress_faces_74000_theft_charge"
> "AN award-winning postmistress has appeared before magistrates accused
> of stealing more than £74,000 from the post office.
> Seema Misra is charged with four counts of false accounting and one of theft
> by employee."
> No wonder she  doesnt want to reveal who "she" (?) is,
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Seema Misra <seemamisra08@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Dear Mr Chief Patron ,
>> The proof of the pudding is in the eating . None of your brilliant legal
>> brains have shown their brillance . Only prejudice emerges.
>> We can play 20 questions on my identity . I am under no legal or moral
>> obligation to inform you of whom I am.
>> Pertinent to note , that you obviously think the language used in the
>> email was permissible.
>> Thanks for the suggestion on whateveryoumaycall talk . So far your website
>> is much more entertaining.
>> S.Misra
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "sroy 1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>
>> To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam
>> Dear Ms Misra
>> As there are apparently quite a few "Seema Misra"'s in the RTI / NGO
>> space could you provide me some clues to better place you. (SNS ?,
>> Righttofood, Assoc4Advocacy ....)
>> In the phrase "condom of the NCPRI" due you take objection to my usage
>> of "condom", or "NCPRI" or both :-)
>> We have many ladies present, who alternate between reading me on
>> weekdays and visiting  the fiction section of www.astatalk.com on
>> weekends (try it - its much better than stardust - honestly).
>> I can solemnly assure you that we have some of the finest legal brains
>> of India on
>> this board (I am one of them), and before making sweeping
>> generalizations on hatred and human rights concerning them, please try
>> to be more specific.
>> Sarbajit
>> Chief Patron and Software Architect to this forum.
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Seema Misra <seemamisra08@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I am absolutely horrified with the language used in this email  network.
>>> - "
>>> condom of the NCPRI" .
>>> I was very happy that I began receiving email from this network ( though
>>> unsolicitied )  , thinking i will get a wide variety of information on
>>> the
>>> types of problems a cross section of people face related to RTI.
>>> Obviously this network caters to a large section of disgruntled  men ,
>>> with
>>> minimal information on  law , and extreme hatred for anyone who raises of
>>> human rights issues other than their human rights.
>>> I will now treat this like I do stardust- at least they are honest .
>>> Seema Misra
>>> e-----
>>> From: Anil Agrawal
>>> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:15 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada
>>> Dam
>>> Why are you agitated? Corruption is a way of life. Get up in the morning
>>> and
>>> read a new scam. Who are involved? Right from Ministers to babus. They
>>> are
>>> looting us. Adarsh scam, papers have been destroyed. What do you make of
>>> it?
>>> Netas and babus are not only saving their skin they want to continue to
>>> cling on to ill gotten flats in Adarsh. NOTHING WILL HAPPEN EITHER IN
>>> CWG,
>>> Anil
>>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,7.0.html
>>>> Appeal No CIC/WB/C/2006/00066
>>>> Dated: 19/4/'06
>>>> Right to Information Act – Section 7(1)
>>>> Name of Applicant: Shri Shekhar Singh, Smt Aruna Roy & others
>>>> Name of Public Authority: Prime Minister's Office
>>>> Corrupt Chief Information Commission gives hearing within 48 hours to
>>>> email complaint of NCPRI big guns. Aruna Roy and Shekhar Singh had
>>>> filed a "life or liberty" RTI request to secure copy of a 3 ministers
>>>> report on SSP. They were already in possession of informal copies, but
>>>> Medha Patkar's advocate (another NCPRI big cheese) needed an "official
>>>> copy" to file in Supreme Court immediately.
>>>> On coming to know about this life or liberty request,  Prakash
>>>> Kardaley contacts me (being in Delhi) to immediately oppose disclosure
>>>> of this information to his NCPRI compatriots. I promptly email a "3rd
>>>> party" request to PMO, which is acknowledged and is transferred along
>>>> with NCPRI's request to Ministry of Water Resources. Along with NCPRI
>>>> I also receive a 3rd party notice for the CIC hearing. As per RTI Act
>>>> the CPIO cannot release information without intimating the 3rd party
>>>> and giving him opportunity to file appeals.
>>>> I and Veeresh Malik (another Hum Janenge moderator) reach the CIC
>>>> venue well in time. We find that neither Aruna Roy nor Shekhar Singh
>>>> are present, instead they have sent Arvind Kejriwal. The moment the
>>>> hearing commences, the CPIO of MoWR informs the CIC that as per
>>>> instructions of his Minister (Saifuddin Soz) he has just handed copies
>>>> of the controversial report (clearly marked as Confidential
>>>> /Top-Secret etc) to Ms Aruna Roy outside the hearing chamber so that
>>>> Prashant Bhushan can file the same in court the next day. I strongly
>>>> protest at this mockery of RTI Act / abuse of RTI process/ denial of
>>>> my 3rd party rights etc, but Habibullah and Ansari have been bought
>>>> off. The completely biased and corrupt order he delivers leaves no
>>>> doubt that he is a puppet.
>>>> The order has been deleted from the CIC website by Habibullah. Now
>>>> here is that order, attached so that the public of India can remember
>>>> what a corrupt person Mr Habibullah is, and how he used the CIC like a
>>>> condom for the NCPRI.

No comments:

Post a Comment