what if PIO gives funny reply to my free RTI application ??
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:44 AM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
1) You can file AS MANY free RTIs as you want - each targeted to get
upto about 20 pages.
2) The FREE complaint route is open
3) You have never experienced the Delhi RTI Act. Its salient features
- No Penalties, Info at Rs 5 per page, Rs 25 RTI application fee, Rs
50 First Appeal fee and so on... All of us RTI haramis (me,
Parivartan, Delhi RTI Munch, ) cut our teeth on that Act, and believe
me I got MUCH more info out of that Act (because of Ms Shailaja
Chandra) than Mr. Habibullah's corrupt little RTI circus.
Sarbajit
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
> 5 pages free ??? come on dear sarbajit. PIO's will simply not give any
> information fully knowing that first appeal and second appeals will be
> costly on applicants pocket hence they will not go for appeals .
>
> RTI must be totally free
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:37 AM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You can have as much free info as you want --> so long as it fits into 5
>> pages.
>>
>> "Let them have any color car they want so long as it is black"
>> - Henry Ford (manufacturer of the Model-T)
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > why you want seconds appeals quantity should drop ???
>> > let more and more people seek free information .
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> rti IS ON OXYGEN NOW .
>> >>
>> >> Very soon RTI will die.
>> >>
>> >> RTI aplication , first appeal and second appeal all should be free.
>> >>
>> >> pages supplied shall also be free.
>> >>
>> >> after all all money belongs to citizen
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Sidharth Misra
>> >> <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I fear, that may create a bidding war if appellants are allowed to
>> >>> pay(bid) for how much they can pay & what services they want in return
>> >>> !
>> >>>
>> >>> What about lesser mortals ?
>> >>>
>> >>> sidharth
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 29 November 2010 04:55, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am willing to pay Rs. 500.00 per second appeal (and even a
>> >>>> complaint)
>> >>>> provided:
>> >>>> 1. The penalty under Sec 20(1) is made mandatory in every case
>> >>>> (If no penalty, the IC is fined Rs 25,000)
>> >>>> 2. The appellant / complainant is made a party to the the penalty
>> >>>> proceedings in each and every case
>> >>>> 3. The ICs do not keep any appeal / complaint pending beyond 90 days
>> >>>> of
>> >>>> receipt in SIC/CIC
>> >>>> (For every day delay in the hearing beyond 90 days - the IC pays
>> >>>> Rs.
>> >>>> 50 per day to the appellant)
>> >>>> 4. The time limit to pronounce an order, after the hearing is
>> >>>> completed,
>> >>>> is clearly specified. For each day of delay beyond the specified
>> >>>> time, the
>> >>>> IC pays Rs. 100 per day to the applicant.
>> >>>> 5. The fees collected by the SIC/CIC do not go towards the payment of
>> >>>> salaries and other benefits of the ICs - the government appointed
>> >>>> them, let
>> >>>> the government pay them. Why should I pay someone and also suffer
>> >>>> him/her ?
>> >>>> 6. Retirement age of ICs should be 58 years.
>> >>>> 7. Just like other retired persons, retired IC only get pension - no
>> >>>> other perquisites.
>> >>>> 7. No retired Babus are brought in to work as the SIC/CIC
>> >>>> staff/officers.
>> >>>> I am also willing to pay Rs. 100 per first appeal, provided:
>> >>>> 1. Penalty of Rs. 100 per day on the FAA for every day delay in
>> >>>> conducting hearing beyond mandated 30 days
>> >>>> In short I will pay, provided the IC and the FAA are also responsible
>> >>>> for what they do (in most cases what they do not do).
>> >>>> RTIwanted
>> >>>> ________________________________
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment