legislated in advance.
Lesser mortals may be given "Legal Aid".
Sarbajit
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I fear, that may create a bidding war if appellants are allowed to pay(bid)
> for how much they can pay & what services they want in return !
>
> What about lesser mortals ?
>
> sidharth
>
>
> On 29 November 2010 04:55, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am willing to pay Rs. 500.00 per second appeal (and even a complaint)
>> provided:
>> 1. The penalty under Sec 20(1) is made mandatory in every case
>> (If no penalty, the IC is fined Rs 25,000)
>> 2. The appellant / complainant is made a party to the the penalty
>> proceedings in each and every case
>> 3. The ICs do not keep any appeal / complaint pending beyond 90 days of
>> receipt in SIC/CIC
>> (For every day delay in the hearing beyond 90 days - the IC pays Rs.
>> 50 per day to the appellant)
>> 4. The time limit to pronounce an order, after the hearing is completed,
>> is clearly specified. For each day of delay beyond the specified time, the
>> IC pays Rs. 100 per day to the applicant.
>> 5. The fees collected by the SIC/CIC do not go towards the payment of
>> salaries and other benefits of the ICs - the government appointed them, let
>> the government pay them. Why should I pay someone and also suffer him/her ?
>> 6. Retirement age of ICs should be 58 years.
>> 7. Just like other retired persons, retired IC only get pension - no other
>> perquisites.
>> 7. No retired Babus are brought in to work as the SIC/CIC staff/officers.
>> I am also willing to pay Rs. 100 per first appeal, provided:
>> 1. Penalty of Rs. 100 per day on the FAA for every day delay in conducting
>> hearing beyond mandated 30 days
>> In short I will pay, provided the IC and the FAA are also responsible for
>> what they do (in most cases what they do not do).
>> RTIwanted
>> ________________________________
>
No comments:
Post a Comment