The proof of the pudding is in the eating . None of your brilliant legal
brains have shown their brillance . Only prejudice emerges.
We can play 20 questions on my identity . I am under no legal or moral
obligation to inform you of whom I am.
Pertinent to note , that you obviously think the language used in the email
was permissible.
Thanks for the suggestion on whateveryoumaycall talk . So far your website
is much more entertaining.
S.Misra
----- Original Message -----
From: "sroy 1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>
To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam
Dear Ms Misra
As there are apparently quite a few "Seema Misra"'s in the RTI / NGO
space could you provide me some clues to better place you. (SNS ?,
Righttofood, Assoc4Advocacy ....)
In the phrase "condom of the NCPRI" due you take objection to my usage
of "condom", or "NCPRI" or both :-)
We have many ladies present, who alternate between reading me on
weekdays and visiting the fiction section of www.astatalk.com on
weekends (try it - its much better than stardust - honestly).
I can solemnly assure you that we have some of the finest legal brains
of India on
this board (I am one of them), and before making sweeping
generalizations on hatred and human rights concerning them, please try
to be more specific.
Sarbajit
Chief Patron and Software Architect to this forum.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Seema Misra <seemamisra08@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am absolutely horrified with the language used in this email network. -
> "
> condom of the NCPRI" .
>
> I was very happy that I began receiving email from this network ( though
> unsolicitied ) , thinking i will get a wide variety of information on the
> types of problems a cross section of people face related to RTI.
>
> Obviously this network caters to a large section of disgruntled men ,
> with
> minimal information on law , and extreme hatred for anyone who raises of
> human rights issues other than their human rights.
>
> I will now treat this like I do stardust- at least they are honest .
>
> Seema Misra
>
>
> e-----
>
> From: Anil Agrawal
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam
> Why are you agitated? Corruption is a way of life. Get up in the morning
> and
> read a new scam. Who are involved? Right from Ministers to babus. They are
> looting us. Adarsh scam, papers have been destroyed. What do you make of
> it?
> Netas and babus are not only saving their skin they want to continue to
> cling on to ill gotten flats in Adarsh. NOTHING WILL HAPPEN EITHER IN CWG,
> 2-G SCAM, ADARSH OR ANYTHING ELSE.
> Anil
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,7.0.html
>>
>> Appeal No CIC/WB/C/2006/00066
>> Dated: 19/4/'06
>> Right to Information Act – Section 7(1)
>> Name of Applicant: Shri Shekhar Singh, Smt Aruna Roy & others
>> Name of Public Authority: Prime Minister's Office
>>
>> Corrupt Chief Information Commission gives hearing within 48 hours to
>> email complaint of NCPRI big guns. Aruna Roy and Shekhar Singh had
>> filed a "life or liberty" RTI request to secure copy of a 3 ministers
>> report on SSP. They were already in possession of informal copies, but
>> Medha Patkar's advocate (another NCPRI big cheese) needed an "official
>> copy" to file in Supreme Court immediately.
>>
>> On coming to know about this life or liberty request, Prakash
>> Kardaley contacts me (being in Delhi) to immediately oppose disclosure
>> of this information to his NCPRI compatriots. I promptly email a "3rd
>> party" request to PMO, which is acknowledged and is transferred along
>> with NCPRI's request to Ministry of Water Resources. Along with NCPRI
>> I also receive a 3rd party notice for the CIC hearing. As per RTI Act
>> the CPIO cannot release information without intimating the 3rd party
>> and giving him opportunity to file appeals.
>>
>> I and Veeresh Malik (another Hum Janenge moderator) reach the CIC
>> venue well in time. We find that neither Aruna Roy nor Shekhar Singh
>> are present, instead they have sent Arvind Kejriwal. The moment the
>> hearing commences, the CPIO of MoWR informs the CIC that as per
>> instructions of his Minister (Saifuddin Soz) he has just handed copies
>> of the controversial report (clearly marked as Confidential
>> /Top-Secret etc) to Ms Aruna Roy outside the hearing chamber so that
>> Prashant Bhushan can file the same in court the next day. I strongly
>> protest at this mockery of RTI Act / abuse of RTI process/ denial of
>> my 3rd party rights etc, but Habibullah and Ansari have been bought
>> off. The completely biased and corrupt order he delivers leaves no
>> doubt that he is a puppet.
>>
>> The order has been deleted from the CIC website by Habibullah. Now
>> here is that order, attached so that the public of India can remember
>> what a corrupt person Mr Habibullah is, and how he used the CIC like a
>> condom for the NCPRI.
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment