Dear Sarbajit Ji As far as long pendency is concerned I wish to bring to your kind notice that in Uttar Pradesh 90% of the SIC judgements are anti law and opposite to information seekers. Some of ICs themselves pleade in place of respondents, they delebrately make delay and allow adjournments. In the cases where PIO has no explanation of causing delay, he must be slapped with fine. But as a part of habit, ICs rarely slap him. It is the tendency of PIO to take adjournment in order to harass the applicant and abandon the appeal. Generally PIO send their subordinates to attend hearing who may have never seen the original application. Attutude of PIO has become "Oh rti......... On too many occassions you call applicants to be indulged with petty issues. Perhaps never realising that at war front a thirsty soldier does not need tanker of water only two sips are needed for life saving. In a country of poor infrastructure with no roads, sanitation, water & food, need of a single paisa utilisation is pertinent. None of the issue is petty. Rather petty problems require more attention to make the country a better place to live. While sitting in Delhi, vision becomes too short. most important issues become petty issues, taxpayers money is more importantly spent like over flowing river water on games rather than making a new power plant. I invite you to see today's The Times of India, you will find a good picture how the taxpayers money is going to deep pockets which I believe The Government shall never be able to recover from. Comming to main issue i feel (1) the IC should devise open formula for slapping fines instead of discriminatory (2) the slapped fines should not be waved off (3) IC should ask both parties to put their point instead of pleading for them. (3) summoning should be by email to atleast all PIOs. We should not forget decision under CPC order XVI, rule 10(3) of IC Anil Toko. Regards Trivendra --- On Fri, 6/8/10, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.
|
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment