Re: [rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ?

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Re: [rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ?

Mr Sarbajit,

Sec 24 ONLY ALLOWS that information that is related to Human Rights or Corruption issues. Nowhere does it say that all issue not pertaining to security or national interests can be disclosed by these organisations.

This Dharmendra is going a bit too far.

RTIwanted

--- On Sun, 7/4/10, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ?
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, July 4, 2010, 5:06 PM

Another thing

If we compare the approach of our "best" IC with that of
Habibullah and SN Mishra on the identical question of DRDO

We find that Mr H has wrung his hands like Pontius Pilate,
and Mishra has taken the babu's way out by saying "not
possible under Rules saar".

http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ WB-27032009- 03.pdf
http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ SM-09072009- 09.pdf

but our group hero has bashed down all the doors like
Dharmendra in his prime and is waiting for some
'mard ka baccha' to challenge him.

On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM, sarbajitr <sroy1947@yahoo. com> wrote:

The answers lie here

http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-17022010- 04.pdf

http://www.rti. india.gov. in/cic_decisions /CIC_LS_A_ 2010_000107. pdf

http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-08102009- 05.pdf
http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-29012010- 06.pdf
http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-02032010- 07.pdf
http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-16102009- 04.pdf

The real point you are missing in all these decisions is
"THIS Commission in a series of decisions has held ..."

One thing you can be sure about is that IC(MLS) is
very well prepared if the DRDO takes him to Court.

Sarbajit