[rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ?

Monday, July 5, 2010

[rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ?

http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/FB-25082009-01.pdf

"DECISIONS & REASONS:
26. Under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, `human rights' have been defined to mean and include the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenant enforceable by courts in India."

Denial of equality in service and promotion, which demeans the individual and affects his life(style) may arguably be ALLEGED to be violation of human rights. There are also so many UN Conventions / Covenants which India has acceded to concerning service employment matters.

Sarbajit

--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, C K Jam <rtiwanted@...> wrote:
>
> Mr Sarbajit,
>
> Sec 24 ONLY ALLOWS that information that is related to Human Rights or Corruption issues. Nowhere does it say that all issue not pertaining to security or national interests can be disclosed by these organisations.
>
> This Dharmendra is going a bit too far.
>
> RTIwanted
>
> --- On Sun, 7/4/10, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@...> wrote:
>
> From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@...>
> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ?
> To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, July 4, 2010, 5:06 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Another thing
>
> If we compare the approach of our "best" IC with that of
> Habibullah and SN Mishra on the identical question of DRDO
>
> We find that Mr H has wrung his hands like Pontius Pilate,
> and Mishra has taken the babu's way out by saying "not
>
> possible under Rules saar".
>
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ WB-27032009- 03.pdf
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ SM-09072009- 09.pdf
>
>
> but our group hero has bashed down all the doors like
> Dharmendra in his prime and is waiting for some
> 'mard ka baccha' to challenge him.
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM, sarbajitr <sroy1947@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The answers lie here
>
>
>
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-17022010- 04.pdf
>
> http://www.rti. india.gov. in/cic_decisions /CIC_LS_A_ 2010_000107. pdf
>
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-08102009- 05.pdf
>
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-29012010- 06.pdf
>
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-02032010- 07.pdf
>
> http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-16102009- 04.pdf
>
>
>
> The real point you are missing in all these decisions is
>
> "THIS Commission in a series of decisions has held ..."
>
>
>
> One thing you can be sure about is that IC(MLS) is
>
> very well prepared if the DRDO takes him to Court.
>
>
>
> Sarbajit
>