A gentleman has used very gentle language I personally Sending my Greetings to our friend for such a nice PARLIAMENTARIAN labguage
Bimal Khemani RTI activist ALIGARH-202001 INDIA Mob:935-972-4625
--- On Thu, 28/10/10, sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote: From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] HumJanenge a nest of haramis To: "HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Thursday, 28 October, 2010, 1:17 PM
Dear Mr. Owner / Moderator HumJanenge
I am aggrieved that I have not been unsubscribed from this group. It is a trivial mater for me to unsubscribe myself, but I require you to do so as an acknowledgment of my grievance.
I reiterate that Humjanenge is a nest of haramis, and I want to have nothing to do with this group. I strongly object to your posting messages I have posted to this group without my permission.
It is groups such as Humjanenge which are responsible for the mess that RTI is in today. You f***ers are the ones responsible for getting one of India's most corrupt citizens appointed as an IC. The entire CommonWealth Games ghotala could only be facilitated because he was handpicked to be the Information Commissioner responsible for Delhi Government and also its PWD (Public Works) division.
That this particular individual has repeatedly demonstrated his inherent corruptibility is demonstrated by messages posted to the HJ group where he calls for proceedings of the Central Information Commission to be
A) conducted without the farce of having an open hearing B) If not, then oral submissions to be restricted to 7 minutes by the appellant C) Orders to be dictated in advance by professional "appraisers" who are paid Rs.200 per case. and so on.
This is exactly what that HJ M**F**r has being doing in the last 2 years sitting in Delhi.
If any 'mai ka laal' disputes this, please read message no.13188 on HJ(yahoo) archives and reads his comments like this.
"If there is a need to observe the farce of a hearing, as per the so- called principles of 'natural justice' enshrined in a Supreme Court judgement, about 60 matters could be disposed on one day and a farcical 'hearing' held, as is done in certain courts. "
Until you unsubscribe me, I shall carry on posting more messages like this, so F*** you too.
Warmly Sarbajit
|
No comments:
Post a Comment