Thursday, October 28, 2010

Re: [HumJanenge] HumJanenge a nest of haramis

Dear Shri Roy,

You were invited to join this group as a courtesy in your capacity as
a founding member of Humjanenge since 2004. The other members of this
group have mostly been directly inducted through transference of the
HJ membership list.

Since you have accepted our invitation (and not been directly added),
it is incumbent upon you to unsubscribe should you wish to leave this
group. The very fact that you are able to post messages to this group
should be adequate confirmation that the owners of the HumJanenge
googlegroup do not always follow the path of the yahoogroup version.

I also humbly request, and as we discussed at the CIC's birthday
party, that your language be parliamentary and that words like
"harami" may be used judiciously.

PMK

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:47 AM, sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Owner / Moderator HumJanenge
>
> I am aggrieved that I have not been unsubscribed from this group. It
> is a trivial mater for me to unsubscribe myself, but I require you to
> do so as an acknowledgment of my grievance.
>
> I reiterate that Humjanenge is a nest of haramis, and I want to have
> nothing to do with this group. I strongly object to your posting
> messages I have posted to this group without my permission.
>
> It is groups such as Humjanenge which are responsible for the mess
> that RTI is in today. You f***ers are the ones responsible for getting
> one of India's most corrupt citizens appointed as an IC. The entire
> CommonWealth Games ghotala could only be facilitated because he was
> handpicked to be the Information Commissioner responsible for Delhi
> Government and also its PWD (Public Works) division.
>
> That this particular individual has repeatedly demonstrated his
> inherent corruptibility is demonstrated by messages posted to the HJ
> group where he calls for proceedings of the Central Information
> Commission to be
>
> A) conducted without the farce of having an open hearing
> B) If not, then oral submissions to be restricted to 7 minutes by the
> appellant
> C) Orders to be dictated in advance by professional "appraisers" who
> are paid Rs.200 per case. and so on.
>
> This is exactly what that HJ M**F**r has being doing in the last 2
> years sitting in Delhi.
>
> If any 'mai ka laal' disputes this, please read message no.13188 on
> HJ(yahoo) archives and reads his comments like this.
>
> "If there is a need to observe the farce of a hearing, as per the so-
> called principles of 'natural justice' enshrined in a Supreme Court
> judgement, about 60 matters could be disposed on
> one day and a farcical 'hearing' held, as is done in certain courts. "
>
> Until you unsubscribe me, I shall carry on posting more messages like
> this, so F*** you too.
>
> Warmly
> Sarbajit

No comments:

Post a Comment