But I never did receive such a notice. Which case is thgis supposed to have been in?
Wajahat
----- Original Message -----
From: "S.D. Sharma" <anonsharma@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:01 pm
Subject: [RTI INDIA] Fwd: [HumJanenge] Former CIC challenges notice by CIC
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com, rti_india@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/HumJanenge/t/437ef2701387b393
>
> Reliable sources, who decline to be quoted, inform that former Chief
> Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has refused to part
> with a
> copy of the contempt notice served on him by the Supreme Court of
> India in December 2009. The information had been requested under RTI
> by a citizen from Bengaluru S Umapathi on 7th September 2010
> when Mr
> Habibullah was the Chief Commissioner. When Mr Habibullah
> refused to
> divulge the contempt notice to the PIO of the Commission, he was
> served a third party notice immediately after he demitted
> office. It
> is now reported that Mr Habibullah has denied that any such contempt
> notice, as widely reported in the media, was ever served
> formally on
> him.
----- Original Message -----
From: "S.D. Sharma" <anonsharma@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:01 pm
Subject: [RTI INDIA] Fwd: [HumJanenge] Former CIC challenges notice by CIC
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com, rti_india@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/HumJanenge/t/437ef2701387b393
>
> Reliable sources, who decline to be quoted, inform that former Chief
> Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has refused to part
> with a
> copy of the contempt notice served on him by the Supreme Court of
> India in December 2009. The information had been requested under RTI
> by a citizen from Bengaluru S Umapathi on 7th September 2010
> when Mr
> Habibullah was the Chief Commissioner. When Mr Habibullah
> refused to
> divulge the contempt notice to the PIO of the Commission, he was
> served a third party notice immediately after he demitted
> office. It
> is now reported that Mr Habibullah has denied that any such contempt
> notice, as widely reported in the media, was ever served
> formally on
> him.
No comments:
Post a Comment