Tuesday, December 15, 2009

[rti_india] Re: Habibullah bungles again in a High Court matter


Dear Sarabjit

When this group was formed in 2006 we were clear that it would be a
platform for true and correct free speech for individual citizens for
Right to Information Act 2005 and ancillary matters. that this is the
only such group in whole of India is trubute to its members and
superlative moderation.

One or 2 persons here did not like what I wrote about Mr Habibullah.
It was voiced on their behalf by Venkatesh Nayak of CHRI. previously
on 21.Sep.2009 in " RE: Re: 3 new Full bench decsions of CIC" he had
admitted that CHRI is a foreign funded agency and advocacy group (
controlled out of London ) which seeks to give "the best defence
allowed at law" to people accused on serious crimes against the
nation. These are the same people (some of their Board members) who
defended Syed Gilani, Mohammed Afzal Guru and those who attacked
India's Parliament. Their close associate Arundhati Roy said this
""What is the hurry? The man is locked up in a high-security cell on
death row. He is not allowed out of his cell for even five minutes a
day. What harm can he do? Talk? Write, perhaps? Surely, even in
Advani's own narrow interpretation of the term, it is in the national
interest not to hang Afzal? At least not until there is an inquiry
that reveals what the real story is and who actually attacked
parliament?" This is in the context of a conviction upheld by the
Supreme Court of India. CHRI are the people who pleaded strongly for
repeal of POTA which allows ISI sponsored terrorists to attack
Parliament with impunity

It is hardly surprising that these foriegn finance RTI groups are
preachnig about RTI Act and ignoring their own statements prime among
them being (in case of traitor Ujjwal Dasgupta) "His trial is stayed
because of the government's refusal to provide him access to documents
he believes to be crucial to his defence. This despite the Delhi High
Court ordering their disclosure. This is the matter we are assisting
with.". So CHRI , Venkatesh Nayak, Shekhar Singh believes that CIC is
more powerful that a High Court. First before assisting anyone assist
yourselfs first and disclose the entire financing which CHRI and
N.C.P.RI gets from foreign sources.

I am happy that this group still consists mainly of the individual
voiceless citizens whose voice is being drown out in din and clangs of
these foreign spies. This last bastille of free speech must always

S D Sharma

--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "sarbajitr" <sroy1947@...> wrote:
> Dear Venkatesh,
> Sorry for the slight delay in your message getting through to the group, but Yahoo has tagged you as a "spammer" (possibly because of your posting history) and it had to be approved by me.
> I quite agree that messages in violation of Yahoo ToS and also our Group "rules" are reprehensible. In these circumstances I usually "name" the member to defend his action or apologise or resign etc.
> As in this case you have already named him, we shall expect an
> appropriate response.
> FYI, Mr Habibullah is a member of this group. Unfortunately due to
> his heavy workload he doesn't get as much time nowadays to reply
> here as he used to - this has perhaps emboldened his detractors.
> Your intervention is an added caution that even the undefended (and
> their parents) have champions here.
> Sarbajit
> --- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "Venkatesh Nayak" <venkatesh@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sarbajit and fellow members,
> > Some group members are posting obnoxious and distasteful comments about
> > individuals who are not even members of this group. Sometimes messages



No comments:

Post a Comment