Oops,
I clarify that I do not classify Commodore L.Batra in category of those who get work done in CIC.
I had included his name as an example of another person whose emails the CIC has taken cognisance of.
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogrou
>
> Hi
>
> I am Sarbajit (one who has conquered everything)
>
> Funnily, this question was put to me too by the CIC when I sent my email complaint. I explained to them as follows:-
>
> a) That "complaints" form the heart of the CIC's 'Soo-moto" powers - see 18(2).
>
> b) That inquiry into "complaints" take precedence over disposal of appeals per the scheme of the RTI Act.
>
> c) That there is no provision in the RTI Act to restrict in any way the form, nature or content of a complaint to the Commission (unlike appeals).
>
> d) That I did not recognise the CIC's illegal Management Regulations which were drafted and approved by idiots (ie, legally deficient morons).
>
> e) That whereas the duly notified rules for APPEALS to the CIC provided for "verification" (which requires a signature), there is no such requirements for complaints - which can be unsigned (and hence do not require a digital / electronic signature to be sent over email).
>
> f) That I demanded parity with Ms Aruna Roy, Commodre Lokesh Batra, Mr Shekhar Singh etc who regularly use emails to get their work done at CIC through Mr Habibullah.
>
> Sarbajit
>
No comments:
Post a Comment