Our Prime Minister is aggrieved that when real India is facing crisis of confidence and trust because of widespread corruption in the country, particularly in Delhi - the national capital of crime and corruption and considers congress and corruption synonyms, and protection given to the most corrupt allies in UPA-I and UPA-II, why the Supreme Court should come to the hep of the poor - justice-deprived India - real India. His complaint is that why people of real India should have faith in Supreme Court and not in failures of his Government? Till there is any so-called leader with clear image crops up, no national interest without political colour will emerge. Present crop of our politicians and bureaucrats will flourish and loot of CWG organisers and Delhi officials will continue. I can assure you that no body will be punished for this loot after the Games as no body in the past has been punished whenever he/she made hundred of crores of rupees. The system has created protectors of the corrupt during the last four decades of misrule of the country.
Shall we have social delivery system of judgements? Whosoever comes as CVC or Central Information Commissioner(s), will not make much difference. We need Independence.
We shall have problems of Naxals or J & K protesters cropping up. The situation gives you a lesson in clear words that we can take up arms if you are not concerned with our grievances.
God may save this country and we can pray only for Independence from corruption and poverty.
An RTI Activist.
From: sarbajitr <sroy1947@yahoo.com>
To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 10 September, 2010 7:42:58 AM
Subject: [rti_india] Re: BJP-Congress battle over next CIC
Dear Jam
Such stories are planted to give the twitterati and foolish little RTI activists (henceforth to be called "FLRA"s on this group) something to discuss.
ICs MA and ANT are not running after this post. We should know, however, that they were not "rejected" by the Selection Committee, but that the Committee could not reach a consensus and arrive at a recommendation at that time.
This story is entirely without basis and has been planted by Shailesh Gandhi's camp to defame MA and ANT. The shortlist of 5 names for the next CIC has been finalised in consultation with the Leader of Opp and the committee meeting is formally scheduled for 18.Sep.2010.
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, C K Jam <rtiwanted@...> wrote:
>
> Sometime back I had raised this issue, but Mr Sarabjit posted that the present lot of ICs have already been rejected by the selection committee.
>
>
> Then why are they being considered all over again ?
>
> Where does the RTI Act say that the senior most IC will become the CIC ?
> This seems to be only a planted story by IC ANT and IC MA supporters - that they are being superceeded. (Or is it a "plant" from Shekhar Singh supporters)
>
> Why is BJP supporting IC ANT ? Is it because it does not want persons from a particular religious community to become consecutive CICs ? In any case, what is the point in either of them becoming CICs ? They have only 2 and 3 months left respectively.
>
> This story looks like a total plant to divert attention from the real "person" who is being considered for the CIC post and just a tactic to confuse everyone and get them off guard.
>
> RTIwanted
>
> --- On Thu, 9/9/10, C K Jam <rtiwanted@...> wrote:
>
> From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@...>
> Subject: [rti_india] BJP-Congress battle over next CIC
> To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 7:37 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_centre-gears-up-for-battle-with-bjp-over-chief-information-commissioner_1435534
>
> Centre gears up for battle with BJP over chief information commissioner
>
> After the bitter fight over the appointment of chief vigilance
> commissioner (CVC) PJ Thomas, another battle is likely to ensue between
> the government and BJP over the replacement for chief information
> commissioner (CIC) Wajahat Habibullah.
>
> While the government is keen on inducting an IAS officer superseding
> MM Ansari and AN Tiwari, the two senior-most information commissioners,
> those close to national advisory council chairperson Sonia Gandhi are
> pushing for an RTI activist. On the other hand, leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj is strongly in favour of AN Tiwari.Under
> the RTI Act, information commissioners are chosen by a committee
> comprising the prime minister, leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha,
> law minister and the minister for personnel.Habibullah is
> retiring on September 30 and since there is no provision for a temporary
> appointment on the powerful nine-member central information commission,
> the government is keen to avoid another clash with BJP. It is also
> under pressure from civil society activists close to Sonia who want one
> of them to be made CIC. They argue that bureaucrats have been
> obstructing RTI movement forward.Various names are doing the
> rounds, with Shekhar Singh, who runs an NGO, topping the list. Arvind
> Kejriwal is also in the run for the job, but he is considered junior in
> age as well as status since he quit Indian Revenue Service to become an
> activist. Former top cop Kiran Bedi is also aspiring to become CIC.Habibullah,
> a retired IAS officer of J&K cadre, was offered a top post in the
> Omar Abdullah government, but the Centre requested him to complete his
> tenure as CIC due to the dispute over his successor. Now, as he retires,
> the onus is on prime minister Manmohan Singh to avoid another clash
> with the opposition.
> =====
> RTIwanted
>
No comments:
Post a Comment