To all,
My new email ID is rarrd27854@yahoo.co.in kindly divert all your
correspondes to the above ID.
Regards,
Das.
> Dear Sarbjit
>
> Ordinarily I would not reply to barking dogs, but Mr Singh and
> Kumaraswamy have made some scandalous and completely untrue
> allegations directed at me which must be formally denied and objected
> to.
>
> Firstly, the information concerning Mr Singh is not sourced from any
> Mr Ravindra Kumar but is from an anonymous wordpress blog by
> Kumaraswamy (incidentally only
> one of over "120" that Kumaraswamy presses out to publicise corrupt
> government
> officers. More on Kumaraswamy's shady niche business later).
>
> Secondly, as so many allegations and counter-allegations against Mr
> Singh are posted on Mr Kumaraswamy's blog, it it silly for Mr
> Kumarasawmy to claim that we are uninformed or know nothing of the
> matter.
>
> Thirdly, this Mr Ravinder Kumar who has filed the main complaint
> against Mr Singh to the Customs, represents himself to be President of
> "Rashtriya Mukti Morcha". As Mr Kumaraswamy (on his blog) repeatedly
> questions the credentials and souces of inside information available
> to RMM/Mr Ravindar Kumar, I suggest that he along with every other
> group member read this Judgement of the Supreme Court in the Jharkhand
> bribery case http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/767802/, and I
> particularly set out
>
> "The petitioner to illustrate that bribe was offered has been able to
> collect credible information regarding one of the bank accounts of
> Respondent No.l, who is one of the four members of Jharkhand Mukti
> Morcha, a regional political parly of Bihar, who voted against the No
> Confidence motion. That credible information is a Saving Bank account
> No. 17108 maintained by Respondent No.l with Punjab National Bank,
> Naroji Nagar Branch, New Delhi. The address i.e. M-12, Green Park, New
> Delhi, given to the bank by respondent No.l is false. The entries in
> the said account showing deposit of huge amounts in cash have been set
> out in petition."
>
> Now if anyone wishes to actually read what Mr Ravindra Kumar
> (credibility attested to by our SC no less) has complained concering
> the great prize-winning Whistleblower@RTI Activist@VB_Singh they can
> read it on Mr Kumaraswamy's (anonymous) wordpress blog (incidentally
> only one of over "120" that Kumaraswamy presses out to publicise
> corrupt government officers. More on Kumaraswamy's shady niche RTI
> business later.)
>
> Here is that link
> http://customsmuddle.wordpress.com/2006/07/02/let-us-take-these-v-m-kumaraswamys-rti-requests-further-and-clean-the-system-please/
>
> Ashish
>
>> Subject: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI Applicants-
>> "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>>
>> Dear Group
>>
>> I have expelled Shri VB Singh from this group. He has repeatedly
>> posted defamatory allegations on our list concerning one Mr Ravindra
>> Kumar who is not a member of this group and with whom he has some
>> personal quarrel. It is pertinent that Shri Singh was repeatedy asked
>> by more than 1 member here to clarify if he had made certain
>> allegations which Mr Kumaraswamy had circulated and the basis for
>> those allegations. Mr. Singh never cared to reply.
>>
>> As per our group's practice, an expelled member can reapply for
>> membership after 14 days. Repeat expulsion shall be permanent.
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> Group Moderator
>>
>> --- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, VB Singh <vijay_bsingh@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Sir,
>> > Â
>> > Please don't react on comments of Ashish Kumar, as he would never come
>> forward to reply. He is another Ravindra Kumar, who has extorted bribe
>> from the customs officers to complaint against me merely to thwart my
>> deputation to CBI. I have asked him to provide his mobile number but
>> he has not replied yet.
>> > Â
>> > Kumaraswamy has clarfified that he was not fooled by me. Bhaskarji
>> has rightly asked him to provide copies of 120Â RTI applications done
>> by other on behalf of me. But I know that he (Ashish)Â would not as
>> his allegations are based on the information provided by those
>> officers of customs who are looting the precious revenue of nation and
>> are real security threat for Mumbai at least. He is being fed by those
>> customs officers of Mumbai who have joined service illegaly, facing
>> disciplinary enquiries of corruption and are indirectly responsible
>> for the deaths of hundreds of innocenent persons in the serial bomb
>> blasts of 1993.
>> > Â
>> > As far as allegation of links with Abu Salem and Chhota Rajan is
>> concerned, this thought would be generated in the mind of a pervert
>> and corrupt person only having real links with underworld.
>> > Â
>> > I avoided this topic to be discussed to save precious time of esteemed
>> members. Sarbajit Sir should not feel offended by this message as it
>> is my right to participate in the discussion pertaining to me. Ashish
>> who has initiated this discussion and let him come clean on his
>> allegations and reveal the basis on which he has based them.  Â
>> > Â
>> > With warm regards,
>> > Â
>> > VB Singh
>> > “The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil,
>> but because of those who look on and do nothing.†- Albert Einstein
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Tue, 31/8/10, eGov RTI <egovrti@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: eGov RTI <egovrti@...>
>> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI Applicants-
>> "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > To: "eGov RTI" <egovrti@...>, ashishkr1965@..., "VB Singh"
>> <vijay_bsingh@...>, kapoorsatish@..., rtirti.khan@..., umi_sbs@...,
>> sroy1947@..., rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "VMK" <vmkumaraswamy@...>,
>> "Bhaskar Prabhu" <mahitiadhikarmanch@...>
>> > Cc: iyer_ga@..., djshah1944@..., harirajmr@..., vmehtaudctbby@...,
>> virender.johar@..., peoplefortransparency@..., lesals2000@...
>> > Date: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010, 11:58 PM
>> >
>> >
>> > Â
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Bhaskar Prabhu,
>> > Â
>> > This is V. M. Kumaraswamy,
>> > Â
>> > Just want to let you know is that ASHISH KR does not have 6th sense
>> the way you have written.
>> > Â
>> > ASHISH KR, does not have SENSE at all !!!
>> > Â
>> > ASHISH KR, does not know what he is talking about and what he is
>> writing about.
>> > Â
>> > ASHISH KR has not responded to my emails at all , WHY ??
>> > Â
>> > Is ASHISH KR, MODERATOR of rti_india yahoogroup ??
>> > If he is, we can all imagine the status of that yahoogroup.
>> > Â
>> > ASHISH KR need to be tamed by rti_india yahoogroup. For writing
>> unwarranted things in the group.
>> > Â
>> > ASHISH KR does nto understand the flight of people. Who is going
>> through hardship in their lives.
>> > Â
>> > People like ASHISH KR makes life MISERABLE for WHISTLE BLOWERS and
>> sincere RTI Activists.
>> > Â
>> > Thanks
>> > V. M. Kumaraswamy
>> > Â
>> > --- On Tue, 8/31/10, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear All,
>> > Oh ! Ashish has 6th sense and he has virtual record of application
>> done on behalf of V.B Singh by others -:) Let him post 120
>> applications that were done by others on behalf of V.B.Singh. Just
>> using the names of Chota Rajan and Abu Selem shows that Ashish is a
>> arm chair public spirited person and has knack to attach these names
>> malign some person, since names are frequently talked in customs.
>> >
>> > In-service for RTI
>> >
>> > Bhaskar Prabhu
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Sat, 8/28/10, eGov RTI <egovrti@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: eGov RTI <egovrti@...>
>> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI Applicants-
>> "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > To: "eGov RTI" <egovrti@...>, ashishkr1965@..., "VB Singh"
>> <vijay_bsingh@...>, kapoorsatish@..., rtirti.khan@..., umi_sbs@...,
>> sroy1947@..., rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "VMK" <vmkumaraswamy@...>
>> > Cc: iyer_ga@..., djshah1944@..., harirajmr@..., vmehtaudctbby@...,
>> virender.johar@..., peoplefortransparency@..., lesals2000@...
>> > Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 2:51 AM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: eGov RTI <egovrti@...>
>> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI Applicants-
>> "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
>> > Cc: ashishkr1965@..., "VB Singh" <vijay_bsingh@...>
>> > Date: Friday, August 27, 2010, 9:47 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > WHAT,  ashish kr1965 ashishkr1965@..., is writing in the
>> rti_india yahoo group is wrong. Ashish kr does not know what he
>> is writing.
>> > Â
>> > This is Mr. V. M. Kumaraswamy of INDIARTI and eGovINDIA Group.
>> > Â
>> > Ashish does not know what has really happened.
>> > Â
>> > Ashish needs to think before writing these things in a group like
>> this.
>> > Â
>> > Mr. V. B. Singh did not fool me.
>> > Â
>> > Thanks\
>> > Sincerely
>> > Â
>> > V. M. Kumaraswamy
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Fri, 8/27/10, VB Singh <vijay_bsingh@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: VB Singh <vijay_bsingh@...>
>> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI Applicants-
>> "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
>> > Date: Friday, August 27, 2010, 8:20 PM
>> >
>> >
>> > Â
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Ashish,
>> > Â
>> > This is not the correct forum to reply to the questions raised by you.
>> I don't want to waste precious time of other group members on personal
>> issues. Please ask VM Kumaraswamy about this. If you are interested
>> in knowing about me please give your location, contact numbers etc.
>> and we would discuss this issue along with VM Kumaraswamy, Darak etc..
>> Â
>> > Â
>> > With warm regards,
>> > Â
>> > VB Singh
>> > “The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil,
>> but because of those who look on and do nothing.†- Albert Einstein
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Sat, 28/8/10, ashish kr1965 <ashishkr1965@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: ashish kr1965 <ashishkr1965@...>
>> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI Applicants-
>> "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
>> > Date: Saturday, 28 August, 2010, 8:35 AM
>> >
>> >
>> > Â
>> >
>> > Dear Mr Singh
>> >
>> > Before asking me for proof of information, please confirm if
>> > you published these allegations below and what your proof
>> > was then ?
>> >
>> > Ashish
>> >
>> > Â Â Dear Sir,
>> >
>> > Â Â Are you also part of the team which is resorting to victimisation
>> and
>> > Â Â harassment.
>> >
>> > Â Â Why is Narayan Singh after me like leach? Why had Narayan Singh
>> audacity
>> > Â Â to inform one of the Supdt. posted in AIU that he had got me
>> transferred
>> > Â Â from Vigilance? Why did he tell another Supdt. that he has got
>> four filres
>> > Â Â opened against me in vigilance and that he would ensure that I do
>> not go
>> > Â Â to CBI on deputation?
>> >
>> > Â Â Had I not requested you to protect me from Narayan Singh? Now
>> Bathija has
>> > Â Â also joined Narayan Singh?
>> >
>> >   Don’t you know that Narayan Singh had been receiveing bribe
>> from Airport
>> >   Officials like BN Ojha for clearing carriers? Don’t you know
>> that Narayan
>> > Â Â Singh Cell number is 9821229380 which is a third party number and
>> he pays
>> > Â Â thousands of rupees monthly bill? Is it not true that there were
>> several
>> > Â Â complanits against Narayan Singh in vigilance which were closed?
>> Don’t you
>> > Â Â know that Narayan Singh had tried to protyect DS Tilwani also? Is
>> it not
>> > Â Â true that Narayan Singh had also protected Alok Garg by leaking
>> the
>> > Â Â contents of files attended by me? Why are you protecting Narayan
>> Singh?
>> >
>> > Â Â Do you agree with allegation that I had accepted bribe of Rs.4
>> crores from
>> > Â Â Taufik Haji Gaffar? If so why do you not call Taufik Haji Gaffar
>> himself
>> > Â Â and verify the fact? Do you not know know what manipulations were
>> beiung
>> > Â Â done in Delhi High court to get the detention order of Taufik
>> Haji Gaffar
>> > Â Â quashed by Ram Jethmalani and Chidambaram after which I had
>> complained to
>> > Â Â President of India after which Taufik was detained?
>> >
>> > Â Â Why did you not call the Rahul Bahandari and Meena two officers
>> of Central
>> > Â Â Excise who allegedly bribed me for not suspending them as per
>> news report
>> > Â Â published in Surat newspaper?
>> >
>> > Â Â I am being victimised and harrased by the officers of vigilance
>> > Â Â directorate to protect Alok Garg and other senior officers of the
>> > Â Â department. I know who was tout of your Additional Director
>> General and
>> > Â Â her husband in Delhi with whom they used to go for dinner in
>> Sidhdhartha
>> > Â Â Hotel, Pusa Road, Delhi. I know how Taufik Haji Gaffar was helped
>> by
>> > Â Â officers of Customs when he was arrested by CIU in 1999 in bogus
>> bank
>> > Â Â gaurantee case.I have documenatary proof to show how one of the
>> Deputy
>> > Â Â Commissioner, Surat DRI, presently posted in the Directorate
>> General of
>> > Â Â vigilance, had protected Taufik in a DRI case in connivance with
>> KO Paul,
>> > Â Â SIO/ DRI, Man Singh SIO/ DRI and Parveen Katyal /I.O., DRI. I
>> know how Dr.
>> > Â Â NK Soren has been protected by Directorate General of Vigilance
>> in a
>> > Â Â export fraud case inspite of clear cut evidence of Jayesh gala
>> against
>> > Â Â him. I know how many Rebate files of Avinash Exports, Surat, have
>> been
>> > Â Â been sanctioned by another Depurty Commissioner, presently posted
>> in the
>> > Â Â Directorate General of Vigilance, looking after Surat Rebate Case
>> on the
>> > Â Â basis of forgeed export documents alonwith Surendra Mehta. I know
>> how an
>> > Â Â Asstt. Commissioner of Vigilance has managed to come to Vigilance
>> Mumbai
>> > Â Â from Kalkata to remain in Mumbai within two months. Can he go
>> against
>> > Â Â whimds and fancy of senior officers? I am aware that one of your
>> Supdt.
>> > Â Â was in touch with Editor Surat Saamna and Tejas Desai and tried
>> to scuttle
>> > Â Â the Surat Rebate investigation. Please ask VH Bathija how many
>> carriers he
>> > Â Â used to clkear every night when he was in AIU and batch and how
>> many girls
>> > Â Â he used to screw. I know at least one lady whom Bathija used to
>> screw? I
>> > Â Â know how PK Sinha has been protected by ADG/Vig, WZU, inspite of
>> his
>> > Â Â having signed the DRI-I backdated in CSD case. I know how the
>> enquries of
>> > Â Â SK Bharadwaj, retired Member CBEC, DS Sra, then Commissioner of
>> Customs
>> > Â Â (General), Mumbai and now Chif Commissioner have been scuttled to
>> allow
>> > Â Â them to retire peacefully and avail promotion.
>> >
>> > Â Â Your department is digging my grave. They are asking the address
>> of my
>> > Â Â dead father for a flat alreadty intimated to the department under
>> Rule 18
>> > Â Â (2)of Conducr Rules.
>> >
>> > Â Â You are posted in Vigilance to eradicate corruption from customs
>> whereas
>> > Â Â you are protecting the corrupots and vicimising the sincere and
>> honests.
>> > Â Â Had I been so corrupt why did you ask me to join vigilance and
>> entrusted
>> > Â Â me the enquiry of Surat Rebate case?
>> >
>> > Â Â You project yourself as one of the honest officer in the
>> department but
>> > Â Â have you ever tried to defend me inspite of knowing fully well
>> that
>> > Â Â enquiries conducted by VH Bathija, MA Andrade and Narayan Singh
>> are based
>> > Â Â on personal vendetta.
>> >
>> > Â Â Since you are one of the blue eyed boy of DG, Vigilance and know
>> me well,
>> > Â Â I request you to request him to close all my files and punish
>> Narayan
>> > Â Â Singh and others who were instrumental in opening these files.
>> >
>> > Â Â Since I have already been placed under cloud for none of my
>> mistake and
>> > Â Â for performing my duties with sincereity and honestly, I am not
>> bothered
>> > Â Â about my career and will expose every corrupt officers of the
>> departement.
>> >
>> > Â Â My father and brothers have left for me enough property to look
>> after
>> > Â Â their families and my family. Please send me to jail after
>> dismissal from
>> > Â Â service and keep honests like Narayan Singh, VH Bathija, MA
>> Andrade, PB
>> > Â Â Chitre, SS Rana, Satish Agrawal, Surendra Mehta, Alok Garg,
>> Saudan Singh, HN Prasd, Ravindra Kumar and Dr. NK Soren etc. in the
>> department.
>> >
>> > Â Â I am copying this email to the President of India, CVC and others
>> to let
>> > Â Â them know how the West Zone Unit of the Directoratae General of
>> Vigilance
>> > Â Â is victimising and harrasing me to protect corrupt officials of
>> customs.
>> >
>> > Â Â Regards,
>> > Â Â VBSingh
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:34 AM, ashish kr1965 <ashishkr1965@...>
>> wrote:
>> > > Dear moderators of this group.
>> > >
>> > > 1. The volume of spam in our inbox originating from this group is
>> > > intolerable, The spam filters need to be readjusted to ruthlessly
>> > > filter out contributions not concerned with RTI.
>> > >
>> > > 2. A cabal of disgruntled officers facing serious disciplinary and
>> > > corruption charges, now masquerading as RTI activists
>> @whistleblowers,
>> > > have obtained membership recently to this group and started using
>> our
>> > > groups bandwidth to divert our focus from discussion on RTI instead
>> to
>> > > unwarranted accusations against Information Commissioners.
>> > >
>> > > 3. Â The contempt notice from the Central Information Commission to
>> Mr.
>> > > Umapathi S is
>> > > a clear caution that free speech has its limits. Mr Umapathi seems
>> > > oblivious to the high office of the President of India in his
>> > > defamatory complaint concerning ANT which is replete with invective
>> > > and  personal spite. One seriously wonders how a public authority
>> like
>> > > the State Bank could employ such individuals, or why we should put
>> up
>> > > with them at our group.
>> > >
>> > > 4) The case of Mr VB Singh is even more serious and deserves
>> immediate
>> > > intervention. He is a practiced hand at misusing yahoo groups since
>> > > 2006.
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/bharatudaymission@yahoogroups.com/msg01800.html
>> > > In another example from 2006 he managed to fool Kumaraswamy of
>> INDIARTI
>> > > http://customsmuddle.wordpress.com/2006/07/02/this-rti-request-to-cvc-of-v-m-kumaraswamy-needs-to-followed-up-by-an-rti-activists-if-any-questions-write-to-v-m-kumaraswamy-he-will-reply-for-your-questions/
>> > > The wild allegations and intemperate language used by Mr Singh in
>> this
>> > > email mandate that such persons should not be allowed to post
>> to/from
>> > > this group or communicate with our members. Shailesh Gandhi, Â
>> Rajesh
>> > > Darak and other Mumbai activists have filed over 120 RTI requests
>> > > collectively on behalf of Mr Singh, a vigilance officer, who faces
>> > > numerous serious accusations of corruption in cross cases iof
>> > > smuggling nvolving Abu Salem, Chota Rajan gangs.
>> > >
>> > > Ashish
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> From: umapathi s <umi_sbs@...>
>> > >> Date: Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:28 AM
>> > >> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI
>> Applicants- "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > >> To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Â Dear Members Now it is becoming clear that the CIC is exceeding
>> its power and its own jurisdiction . AS one of our members
>> mentioned it is nothing but  tactics to silence our voice.
>> > >>
>> > >> In order to have a constructive conclusion, I mention below points
>> which may help members to decide on the legality of the contempt
>> notice issued by CIC.
>> > >>
>> > >> 1) Â Â There is a dilemma whether or not CIC is a court.
>> > >>
>> > >> 2) Â Â If we accept that CIC is a court, even in this case, CIC
>> has no power to issue the show- cause notice for Contempt
>> proceedings.
>> > >>
>> > >> 3)    As per one of the decisions of the Hon’ble High court
>> of Delhi,  “the lower courts have no power to prosecute a
>> person for contempt of court†. ‘A perusal of provisions of the
>> Contempt of Courts Act would show that a court subordinate to high
>> court has no powers to initiate proceedings under the Contempt of
>> Courts Act. Under the act, the high court alone can take cognizance
>> of an alleged contempt having been committed in respect of
>> subordinate courts,’ the court said.
>> > >>
>> > >> 4) Â Â Â Only higher courts can take cognizance of contempt
>> committed by a person against lower judiciary. Â In the same
>> Judgments the court observed that “A subordinate court is
>> supposed to send a reference of the matter to the high court. A
>> subordinate court cannot itself assume jurisdiction under the
>> Contempt of Courts Act and issue show cause notice as to why
>> contempt proceedings should not be initiated,
>> > >>
>> > >> 5)    Whether our group is private or public it doesn’t
>> matter much. What is imp is publication is any manner which
>> scandalize or interfere with the administration of justice. This is
>> to be decided by following the rule of law and facts and
>> circumstances of the case.
>> > >>
>> > >> 6) Â Â Â The contempt proceedings have to be used only sparingly
>> and cautiously.
>> > >>
>> > >> 7) Â Â Â The contempt Jurisdiction is not to protect an
>> individual Judge. ( if  ICs are declared as Judges).it is meant
>> for the maintenance of effective legal system.
>> > >>
>> > >> 8) Â Â Â Contempt proceedings can be used only when the
>> proceedings are pending. (In the instant case, the IC had already
>> decided the case).
>> > >>
>> > >> 9) Â Â Â Contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal and
>> quasi-judicial.
>> > >>
>> > >> 10) Â I shall be attaching the Scanned copy of the notice received
>> by me soon (I have no scanner at Home, hence the difficulty), to
>> prove the authenticity of my posting as some members mentioned.
>> > >>
>> > >> 11) Â I started the thread on this topic since it is a new and
>> vital subject on the powers of the CIC and our Fundamental rights.
>> The aim is to invite the views of OUR enlightened members .Tomorrow
>> our other members may be forced to face such situations
>> > >>
>> > >> 12)  I have addressed the complaint to Hon’ble President as
>> “Her Excellency†in my complaint. No defamatory statement is
>> made by me and it has nothing to do with the present notice issued
>> by CIC.
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards.
>> > >>
>> > >> ________________________________
>> > >> From: VB Singh <vijay_bsingh@...>
>> > >> To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
>> > >> Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 9:42:05 AM
>> > >> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Another Major Threat to RTI
>> Applicants- "Notice of CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS BY C
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment