Re: [HumJanenge] Re: NGO FINED FOR OFFENSIVE RTI QUERIES

in solidarity. sa ------------ Nakkar Khana   my blog hosted at http://www.openxcess.blogspot.com     Sachin Agarwal +91 94152 55042 --- On Sun, 24/10/10, vishalkudchadkar <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com> wrote: From: vishalkudchadkar <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: NGO FINED FOR OFFENSIVE RTI QUERIES To: "HumJanenge" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Sunday, 24 October, 2010, 10:02 PM In RTI act , nowhere the word " Offensive RTI " is there.RTI query is a rti query. if this is under exclusion clause , the same should be told to pardarshita by the pio. personal questions can be asked under rti and these should be decided as per section 8 and 11 of act . the court should have decided the case in the light ofthe rti act . this court order shall be detrimental to rti movement and should be challanged . How can you fight corruption with tied hands. Whats the harm in asking what the corrupt officials and netas do . on the one hand supreme court comments to legalise corruption on the other hand high court want to nurture it .   can anyone blackmail an honest officer . no , never. these are the corrupts who gets blackmailed . high court should have considered it .   babita --- On Sun, 10/24/10, sachin <tellsachin@yahoo.com> wrote: From: sachin <tellsachin@yahoo.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: NGO FINED FOR OFFENSIVE RTI QUERIES To: HumJanenge@yahoogroups.co.in Date: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 4:36 PM i would also like to know that under what provision it was done. sa --- In HumJanenge@yahoogroups.co.in, Nina <la.lanina@...> wrote: > > Could anyone provide more details abt y d NGO was fined? As in wat where d Qs asked, to which Govt Dept and d like.. > > Regards, > Nina.