At the last count I did, there were only 9 ICs in the whole country who were not bureaucrats or related to Government services.
Do you think that in a country of 1.2 Billion people only 9 "eminent" people are available who are non bureaucrats ?
The truth (which you do not dare to state) is that to become a IC you need to be totally corrupt, pliable, slimy and easily manipulated - otherwise how will the Government ever be able to hide the Information that it does not want to ever disclose.
Read the CV of each and every IC in India and you will know when and how they scratched someones back.
http://www.kehalim.com/aff?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.indianexpress.com%2Fnews%2F-RTI-used-as-a-tool-not-to-give-information-%2F695438&r=441745&p=6706459>
On the subject of a vast majority of ex-bureaucrats being appointed as CIC's and IC's in the states, Tewari said that while being a bureaucrat should not be a disqualification for being appointed to the posts, the appointments should ideally, be spread out, for instance, to include academics and even journalists. "It is the political class which has to understand the importance of these appointments," he asserted. "While a few state governments are careful about whom they pick, I am unconvinced about the appointments made in some states. The selection could have been a lot better."
(Now, please don't come back and give me the old story about a few rotten apples or "all are not same" or even bureaucrats change after they become ICs')
RTIwanted
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
To: "RTI India : Right to Information, CIC" <rti_india@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 10:10:59 PM
Subject: [RTI INDIA] Re: krishnarajrao fast unto death ..
Dear Dr Arun,
C) Today when you say that A N Twari who passed the Civil Service
selection and
rises to head the vast Indian bureaucracy is not sufficiently
"eminent" to be a CIC,
what are your own qualifications that you felt that you can apply.
Till 2 years back
nobody in RTI had ever heard of you. Only when you retire do you seek
out these
offices of profit.
Sarbajit
Do you think that in a country of 1.2 Billion people only 9 "eminent" people are available who are non bureaucrats ?
The truth (which you do not dare to state) is that to become a IC you need to be totally corrupt, pliable, slimy and easily manipulated - otherwise how will the Government ever be able to hide the Information that it does not want to ever disclose.
Read the CV of each and every IC in India and you will know when and how they scratched someones back.
http://www.kehalim.com/aff?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.indianexpress.com%2Fnews%2F-RTI-used-as-a-tool-not-to-give-information-%2F695438&r=441745&p=6706459>
On the subject of a vast majority of ex-bureaucrats being appointed as CIC's and IC's in the states, Tewari said that while being a bureaucrat should not be a disqualification for being appointed to the posts, the appointments should ideally, be spread out, for instance, to include academics and even journalists. "It is the political class which has to understand the importance of these appointments," he asserted. "While a few state governments are careful about whom they pick, I am unconvinced about the appointments made in some states. The selection could have been a lot better."
(Now, please don't come back and give me the old story about a few rotten apples or "all are not same" or even bureaucrats change after they become ICs')
RTIwanted
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
To: "RTI India : Right to Information, CIC" <rti_india@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 10:10:59 PM
Subject: [RTI INDIA] Re: krishnarajrao fast unto death ..
Dear Dr Arun,
C) Today when you say that A N Twari who passed the Civil Service
selection and
rises to head the vast Indian bureaucracy is not sufficiently
"eminent" to be a CIC,
what are your own qualifications that you felt that you can apply.
Till 2 years back
nobody in RTI had ever heard of you. Only when you retire do you seek
out these
offices of profit.
Sarbajit
No comments:
Post a Comment