on the "6rth day of his fast".
2) Well if he is not cheating, he should suspend himself in an acrylic
box like David Blaine (44 days), or the Chinese fellow (49 days) or
the Russian (50 days) have done.
Sarbajit
On Oct 11, 6:39 pm, VijayBahadur Singh <vijaybaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whatever you post does not mean that it is always correct. FYI, Krishnaraj
> Rao has started his fast on 06.06.2010 and by simple calculation it is his
> 6th day of fast. Admittedely, you are opposed to Krishnaraj and others who
> support him, but that does not mean that you keep on spreading your own
> calculation and logic. It is only you and your friends sitting in Delhi
> think that he is cheating and you are dead wrong now. BTW where is another
> post of your favourite (if not yourself) regarding Krishnaraj which he
> assured to post shortly, in one of his post.
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:50 PM, sroy1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > IS KRISHNARAJ RAO CHEATING ??
>
> > Rao is now supposedly on the 8th day of his fast. He should be
> > dead by now. The average human lasts 3 days without food and water,
> > a few make it upto 6 days, and a microscopic minority make it
> > past a week.
>
> > So why would anybody who believes in the scientific method,
> > believe that Rao is not cheating (like Anna Hazare who supposedly
> > got the Mah Govt to pass the MRTI Act on the 12th day of his "fast")
>
> > Lets see how long this farce continues.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On Oct 11, 6:14 pm, sroy1947 <sroy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Your logic is not correct. There are other Commissions which require
> > > "eminent" people to be appointed by law. All the eminent people
> > > prefer those Commissions after retirement because they dont have
> > > to work too much, unlike the CIC where they have to slog their balls
> > > off.
>
> > > So the citizens of India should be very grateful that when no other
> > > eminent citizens an be found, the overworked baboos from the DoPT
> > > persuade themselves to be pressganged for another 5 years before
> > > the mast.
>
> > > PS: I was the one (BTW its Sarbajit';s 3rd Law) to state that the
> > > only qualification required to be selected as an IC is that you are
> > > either corrupt or pliable (preferably both).
>
> > > Sarbajit
No comments:
Post a Comment