[RTI INDIA] Re: " section 2(h)" substantial , IC want it to be specified

">>and don't invite the Moderator to remove you from the Group, "

This Moderator does not believe in removing people from the group
unless it is absolutely necessary.

This Moderator does not believe that ordinary (ie normal) citizens
should go to courts / use RTI.

This Moderator believes that should a citizen use RTI then he must
be prepared to fully fight with all resources at his command to WIN.

This Moderator believes that Mr Mohit (and other RTI applicants)
should be more open about their RTI requests /appeals so that
the group (as a whole) can assist them better.

This Moderator (like India's CVC) believes that corruption is a
way of life in India, and that RTI Act is not to be used to fight
corruption. Instead we should ensure that we (as individuals)
are absolutely pure and incorruptible. It is impossible for
so-called corruption fighters to remain pure (in the same way that
it is futile to expect a sweeper to be clean)

Sarbajit

On Oct 7, 9:26 am, umapathy subramanyam <umapathi.s....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Mohit,
>
> This is what happens to our Group when we approach the matter on emotional
> basis, rather than on logical and meaningful purpose. The purpose of this
> Group is to discuss matters concerning RTI Act. Please have a pragamatic
> approach, and don't invite the Moderator to remove you from the Group, since
> that is not our Group motive.
>
> There are some positive feedback from Sarbajit sir on your issue and you can
> work upon that. your motive is now to win the case since the order of the
> CIC is illegal.It is good that you have shown your bonafide interest in
> filing these application and Appeals. please pursue the matter till you
> get logical conclusion on your matter.
>
> I personally feel that issue raised by you is affecting the larger public
> interest since finally it is the Money and influence that help parents to
> get admission to their Ward. If that is so, why can't you approach the
> matter by filing Public Interest Litigation(PIL) so that such corrupt
> practcies by the Private School can be removed.
>
> Secondly we can't bring the pressure on CIC i.e. SG to get orders in our
> favour. The only way is to challeng the order in hon'ble High Court. I too
> feel that the order of the CIC is illegal and the points/Grounds urged by
> you are not considered by CIC and hence you have right to approahc the High
> Court by making the prayers to interpret section 2(f) of the Act in your
> context.
>
> The suggestion made by our Group Member shri Manoj Kamra also can be
> explored. please try from this angle too.
>
> with regards.
>
> Umapathi.s
>